Page 4 of 4

Posted: 2007-06-29 09:18
by KP
AN/PEQ-2 on the right side of the weapon:

Image

The big question now is, of course, M203 or vertical grip? :razz:

Posted: 2007-06-29 10:14
by robbo
Do 2 models one with 203' and one with vert grip :p wow that PEQ looks sweet as man we need this in PR.

Image
A little help accessory wise :D

Bobs gonna cry when he sees the amount of rails and rail accessories.

Posted: 2007-06-29 10:23
by KP
Oh my God. Let's whack on a 100rd drum mag while we're at it, shall we? :lol:

Posted: 2007-06-29 14:20
by sekiryu
If you're going to put a GL on an HK416, it has to be the HK one.

Posted: 2007-06-29 19:52
by Teek
use the Surefire Foregrip W/Light.
How about the second stock the M~g~ul CTR or whatever stock
oh, what about some Mag pulls? :p

Posted: 2007-06-29 22:02
by requiem
You've gotta even out the distribution of tri's. You've put a ton in the rails although the sight is what's really in your face when you're playing (and it's looking very low poly). Apart from that minor proportion errors (i.e. foregrip). Can we see a wire? Cheers

Posted: 2007-06-29 22:17
by KP
Correct as always.
I forgot to mention that this is not a model that's going to end up in the game. It's simply a way for me to experiment a little, work on some techniques, try some new stuff and generally messing around (I'm actually having a laugh making the thing, always wondering what else I can whack on there to make it look even more 1337 and utterly, utterly silly). If I was going for an in-game model, I'd obviously have increased the poly count on the Aimpoint and sodded the rails, and generally paid more attention to poly count (it's about 5000 triangles right now, if memory serves) and poly distribution.

And a quick wireframe screenie for ya:

Image

Oh, and BTW: the proportions match the reference pics I've got, so unless the pics are off, it's probably the angle of the render that screws the proportions up...

Posted: 2007-07-01 03:52
by tele-loe-
Great job.

Posted: 2007-07-01 13:30
by Griffon2-6
No, the size is correct, it's just too far from the mag. But I guess you can install it there in real life.

Posted: 2007-07-01 13:42
by KP
You can put it wherever you like; that's an advantage with the RIS. It depends on how long your arms are.

Posted: 2007-07-01 14:32
by bosco_
Looks really good.
I'm making one for fun, too.

Posted: 2007-07-01 18:29
by T4nn13
Nice one man!
But to be honest, the 416 would look superbe with Iron Sights!

Posted: 2007-07-01 20:10
by Lampshade111
They need to find a way to add a rail interface system to a weapon without making the whole gun look bad.

Posted: 2007-07-01 20:16
by bosco_
Who cares about the look in combat? lol

Posted: 2007-07-01 20:22
by KP
Well, you know, the whole rail thing...is like, so last year. :razz:
T4nn13 wrote:Nice one man!
But to be honest, the 416 would look superbe with Iron Sights!
Indeed, but then I wouldn't be able to add the most possible silly little gadgets, would I? :razz:

Posted: 2007-07-01 23:50
by robbo
Maybe a tactical spoon a surefire water dispenser :p and a PR count down to v0.6 clock

Posted: 2007-07-04 00:50
by KP
Did someone say Magpul CTR buttstock? :razz:

Image

Posted: 2007-07-04 03:51
by 77SiCaRiO77
nop, nobody say Magpul CTR buttstock .

but its look great btw :p

Posted: 2007-07-04 08:45
by KP
Yes, someone did say it:
Teek wrote:How about the second stock the M~g~ul CTR or whatever stock
:razz: