Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Posted: 2009-01-01 17:06
good days... good days...
mp5punk wrote:wait what does this stuff do?
It's a changelog....meaning it shows what the DEVs changed from .8 - .85...jeez man.
Project Reality Forums
[Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Page 4 of 5
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Posted: 2009-01-01 17:31
It's a changelog....meaning it shows what the DEVs changed from .8 - .85...jeez man.
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Posted: 2009-01-01 18:17
really really stupid
un code it before you post it first dude
omg like 90% of the dude's reading this has no clue whats going on
un code it before you post it first dude
omg like 90% of the dude's reading this has no clue whats going on
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Posted: 2009-01-01 19:45
I'm a Dude and I understand what's going on.ExisSellos wrote:really really stupid
un code it before you post it first dude
omg like 90% of the dude's reading this has no clue whats going on
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Posted: 2009-01-01 21:16
OH my god your right he forgot to decode it for you. DB you know you need to hit decode before posting these things 
silly dude
silly dudeIts not teasing if you figure it outGeneral Dragosh wrote:wiiiiiiiii here we go again with the teasing
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Posted: 2009-01-01 21:39
... really really stupid ... you're right.ExisSellos wrote:really really stupid
un code it before you post it first dude
omg like 90% of the dude's reading this has no clue whats going on
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Posted: 2009-01-01 22:53
no its gettin really wired....
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Posted: 2009-01-01 22:55
what do you expect??
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Posted: 2009-01-01 22:57
not this kind of "game" 3 times in a row... First time it was ok... Second i accept it again... But a third time... Where is the kick on that?
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Posted: 2009-01-01 22:59
Jonny wrote:MATERIAL: Updated wreck to only be destroyed by C4, Slams, Tank rounds, bombs, heavy machineguns. (dbzao)
Why HMGs?
If a HMG can destroy then why not 40mm nades, 30mm API/HEAT rounds, etc.
Surely you should have to go out of your little fort and deal with the wreck properly!
Maybe you decoded it wrong
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Posted: 2009-01-02 10:39
Sure hope he did.
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Posted: 2009-01-02 16:18
You decoded it wrong, Jonny. The word is "mxxxxxxs," so "machineguns" can't fit. "Missiles" is a better fit.Jonny wrote:MATERIAL: Updated wreck to only be destroyed by C4, Slams, Tank rounds, bombs, heavy machineguns. (dbzao)
Why HMGs?
If a HMG can destroy then why not 40mm nades, 30mm API/HEAT rounds, etc.
Surely you should have to go out of your little fort and deal with the wreck properly!
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Posted: 2009-01-02 17:05
Now that'll make wrecks the hassle that they ought to be. I can imagine, that Militia tank on fools road would be as much of a pain on the bridge destroyed or alive.Charity Case wrote:You decoded it wrong, Jonny. The word is "mxxxxxxs," so "machineguns" can't fit. "Missiles" is a better fit.
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Posted: 2009-01-02 21:49
how many more builds do u guys think? Im guessing its between 1-3.
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Posted: 2009-01-02 21:51
Well considering 0.85 isn't a patch, it's a new build, i would say from past guesses, .809 so I'll go with, 0.858 or 0.857.Fox_Naturalist wrote:how many more builds do u guys think? Im guessing its between 1-3.
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Posted: 2009-01-02 22:06
forgive me for asking but what do the numbers actually mean lol?Scot wrote:Well considering 0.85 isn't a patch, it's a new build, i would say from past guesses, .809 so I'll go with, 0.858 or 0.857.
Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Posted: 2009-01-02 22:37
They seem to mean the build number. Current 0.85 build is 0.85_3_. Though I always though they mean the month when the version was released. 
ops:
ops:Re: [Changelog] PR v0.853 third test build
Posted: 2009-01-03 05:05
So we have to have the details of the log hidden from us why exactly?
How am I to decide if I want to download it if I don't know what it contains?
-Ben
How am I to decide if I want to download it if I don't know what it contains?
-Ben