Page 4 of 7
Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 09:26
by Rudd
Gonna use this vehicle as the FSG very nicely, need a map designed around it
good work, looking forward to the patch
Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 09:44
by Nitneuc
To bad that's not really possible in BF2 (is it?)
This is, FH2 did it for the tanks. Unfortunately you can't have 6 outside and 6 inside vehicle passengers slots simultaneously due to BF2 engine limit ; as said above.
Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 09:55
by LeChuckle
awesome, now lets give the T90 some refleks missiles as well

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 10:31
by General_J0k3r
pure seks
NATO BE AWARE

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 11:01
by Drude
OH YES! This is the update and fix that I have been waiting most of the all.
Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 14:50
by Deadfast
SocketMan wrote:
I heard a lot of talk about T-90 and BTR90 not being "appropriate",and thus removed from the MEC arsenal in the next release.
Is BMP3 replacing the (T-90) tank or is there something else coming?
(besides the BRDM2/BTR60)
According to Jaymz it will be USI's T-72 for 0.85:
'[R-DEV wrote:Jaymz;861011']USI's T72-M1 Will be the replacement of the MEC T-90 for 0.85. But that is only temporary, there is a proper modern tank that is in the works in which will take on the role as the MEC's MBT. Sadly, this won't make it in game for 0.85 but it's a top priority for 0.9.
[R-DEV]Jaymz wrote:For 0.85 it will just mirror the Abrams. When it gets replaced in 0.9 though, it will be total asymmetry across the board. Both the new PLA/MEC tanks coming in 0.9 will have significantly different traits that will make NATO vs OPFOR tank combat very unique. A front page news post or a dev journal post will be made when both of these tanks are finished and it will go into detail about what I mean.
Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 15:14
by Expendable Grunt
I came a little.
Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 15:16
by LeChuckle
Deadfast wrote:According to Jaymz it will be USI's T-72 for 0.85:
I SMELL ZTZ 99

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 15:17
by LeChuckle
oops, i meant to quote the last two quotes that he quoted
Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 15:50
by ExisSellos
omg dude
i dont feel good
i think im in love
Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 16:09
by Rangu
sweet, sexy and OP!
Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 16:51
by single.shot (nor)
fappadelic!
Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 17:30
by agentscar
Ooo,The M2A2 and this shall duke it out now!!!But I'll make sure I'm in my M2A2,to pwn this thing..lol.
-good job on the BMP guys.

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 17:39
by sentinel
You have created a monster! I Love it. Hope see it in maps that arent dominated by MBTs.
Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 17:45
by sn1p3rslippinz
Yeh great job guys
Looking forward to using this bad boy!!
Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 17:46
by Zoddom
wtf? oO NICE...but
how should you fire so much weapons with one mouse?
Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 18:01
by hall0
This thing is so uber

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 18:06
by sakils2
I just saw a
video. As you can see, the small cannon shoots 30 mm. In this
video the big cannon shoots 100 mm. My question is. Will there be any delay between 100 mm/AT10 and 30 AP/30 HE?
Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 18:30
by DeadSmile187
I like it

new Enemy for Nato

Re: [Vehicle] BMP-3
Posted: 2009-01-09 18:45
by Tannhauser
On about those asking if it is the *main* APC for MEC ; Factions (like IRL) are not restricted to have only one type of *main* APC. So seeing MEC having imported BTRs (60-80 or 90) and BMP-3s is fine for me.
I suppose there are chances of seeing a large combined ops map with Russian Forces that would have BTR-90's, and BMP-3's in the future (0.9?). Even tho Russian doctrine is to send the older stuff first... For simulations sake?
