Project Reality Forums

[R-MOD]KP wrote:Dude... The M82 is semi-automatic. And .50-calibre. Do you have any idea of the tardery that will attract? Seriously.

And why's everyone so keen on mirror-balancing everything, even to the point of ignoring realism? Did no-one read my previous posts?

There will always be tards in PR so we have to ignore them, but we have to focus on realism, and most of all make it fun to play PR.

Lowering the zoom was a good idea


About the overpowered shit: having a cobra on Muttrah City, isn't that overpowered? or apc's against taliban inf soldiers? an apc is a way more effective that the M82, so I really don't see the problem its great to have a lot of apc's on one team but not two poor M82 snipers,,,

Its the mappers task to balance the teams with adding less cars f. ex. if they get one transport helicopters etc.
Let the infantry weapons be there, but balance the teams with the vehicles they will have to disposal for their team.

[R-COM]pleym wrote:
About the overpowered shit: having a cobra on Muttrah City, isn't that overpowered? or apc's against taliban inf soldiers? an apc is a way more effective that the M82, so I really don't see the problem its great to have a lot of apc's on one team but not two poor M82 snipers,,,

i absolutely agree with you pleym.

i dont stop playing fools road just because russians get lots of tanks and APCs.

i dont ragequit on muttrah because the cobra is owning all our apcs.

You take the god damn AA or AT and TAKE CARE OF IT!

this is one of the things i love about pr: the (un)balance

the opfor`s sneaky tactics with often underpowered weapons but superior fighting possitions.

the bluefor`s superior firepower and range but looses to the enemy possitions

even though US have supperior weapons to the taliban on korengal i have yet to see a round where US have a crushing victory.

if you want perfect balance, go play vanilla!

Zeno wrote:if you want perfect balance, go play vanilla!

I can't accept that, J10 is pure ownage in vbf2.

[R-COM]Hauteclocque wrote:I can't accept that, J10 is pure ownage in vbf2.

LOL, well we have it on PR also

[R-COM]Hauteclocque wrote:I can't accept that, J10 is pure ownage in vbf2.

its been fixed in BF2 1.5

i want to see more feedback and what you think this faction is going to be like to play and what gameplay you want to see.

lexmyr wrote:Why will the...
- Rifleman specialist have EOTech on his 416?
- Combat engineer have MP7?
- HAT have RFK (carl gustav)? The RFK is the same calibre as the US LAT (AT4, 84mm).

And will the HK417 marksman have a silencer?

What about M72?

Adetter wrote:What about M72?

imo the carl gustav is more fitting caliber for lat.

[R-COM]pleym wrote:There will always be tards in PR so we have to ignore them, but we have to focus on realism, and most of all make it fun to play PR.

Lowering the zoom was a good idea


About the overpowered shit: having a cobra on Muttrah City, isn't that overpowered? or apc's against taliban inf soldiers? an apc is a way more effective that the M82, so I really don't see the problem its great to have a lot of apc's on one team but not two poor M82 snipers,,,

Its the mappers task to balance the teams with adding less cars f. ex. if they get one transport helicopters etc.
Let the infantry weapons be there, but balance the teams with the vehicles they will have to disposal for their team.

But is it realistic to have M82 as a regular sniper rifle :S

allright guys, quit the M82 discussion now, this is a thread ment to be used as a questions and feedback thread, but we have filled it with sniper rifle discussion. this decision will be taken by the NF team when it is needed, it is not a issue yet.

now back on topic guys

I will not tolerate "but it is on topic"

agreed H.sta.

Is there anything the players spesificly want in our maps?

i want the players to have their word in the maps they are playing on

Lutefisk wrote:I want atleast 1 transport chopper

you will not be disapointed

we are having some trouble with getting a leopard 2 model... we need modeler

I think that Germans and Dutch got a finished one.

GF got the OPK model

NF need the A4 model though even its a lot more ugly then the A6

we are also looking into if we are going to use the nm-142 "rakettpanserjager"



Vehicle:
Origin: USA (M113 A2), rebuilt in Norway in the eighties
Engine: Detroit diesel V6 210 HP
Crew: commander, driver, gunner and loader
Fuel tank capacity: 360 dm³
Speed forward: 64 km/h
Trench crossing: 168 cm
Vertical wall climbing: 60 cm
Range: 480 km Weight: 11 620 kg
Dimensions: length: 4,86m width: 2,69m height: 2,93m
Armament: 2 TOW launchers, 1 MG3, smoke dischargers

I'd like to see some epic terrain, woods, and maybe a place to do some hardcore climbing with the rm-specialist

Weird to see that you are still working on your design plan so long after the begining of your subforum.

you know... new leadership and all that