Project Reality Forums

Tonight on Burning Sands there was 4-5 admins online but everyone was on MEC side (some NEW and KSK guys). I tried constantly report no mic players and players that didn't go by server rules but those guys only got few warnings here and there. Game was unbalanced and I almost couldn't get any response from admins. Only thing that worked out was apc stealing report when Rage talked with me in TS

we decided on our community meeting to give the new players a chance to get their mic sorted.

we will start kicking for MIC again on Monday 15th of June.

Had a very good round on Shija tonight. Was a close game with flags being capped all over the place. And my public squad managed to kill people, so I am happy.

yeah both team managed to not defend their flags so it ended up quite close. Could have won if someone had defended Train Bridge.

In the end there were a lot of fun skirmishes around the rice paddies with lots of maneuvering. Was a great blast!

Hi i got banned from your server about two weeks ago, i was new and made mistakes, it says its because of teamkills but im afraid i dont remember precisely when i got banned but my ingame name is Skurge89, im horribly sorry if i shit up someones game, it wont happen again. i was just very new i think it was one of my first days playing and i accidentally shot friendlies because they looked like enemy at that range, ive gotten better now i even lead squads quite succesfully, not alot of servers play insurgency as often as id like it, i humbly ask to be granted back in.

Skurge89

Skurge89 wrote:Hi i got banned from your server about two weeks ago, i was new and made mistakes, it says its because of teamkills but im afraid i dont remember precisely when i got banned but my ingame name is Skurge89, im horribly sorry if i shit up someones game, it wont happen again. i was just very new i think it was one of my first days playing and i accidentally shot friendlies because they looked like enemy at that range, ive gotten better now i even lead squads quite succesfully, not alot of servers play insurgency as often as id like it, i humbly ask to be granted back in.

Skurge89

Hello Skurge and welcome to Project Reality!

Please head to www.newcommunity.eu ? Foren-?bersicht and post in the Ban appeal forums
( www.newcommunity.eu ? Thema anzeigen - How to deal with your ban )

I am sure we can clear this one up so that you'll be able to play again.

Good luck.

Nate. wrote:Hello Skurge and welcome to Project Reality!

Please head to www.newcommunity.eu ? Foren-?bersicht and post in the Ban appeal forums
( www.newcommunity.eu ? Thema anzeigen - How to deal with your ban )

I am sure we can clear this one up so that you'll be able to play again.

Good luck.

see this is the problem and im afraid to anger you with what might look like incompetence, but i cant log into that site, i tried to log in there first, i saw this thread and tried my luck, i just have major problems logging into that forum

Skurge89 wrote:see this is the problem and im afraid to anger you with what might look like incompetence, but i cant log into that site, i tried to log in there first, i saw this thread and tried my luck, i just have major problems logging into that forum

We have issues with spambots so we closed the registration in our forums.

You have been timebanned for mumblespam. if you still cant join the server ill write a unban request for you.

2015-06-05 23:49:15: TB performed by '[NEW] Picard' on ' skurge89': mumble spam banned by [NEW] Picard

Pls make sure you keep your mouth shut while squad briefing timer and due the round ending.

mariachi

After today's "incident" I would suggest adding on [NEW]'s rules something to define what category the AT-Vehicles fall in.

These vehicles by definition are not APC/IFVs and by role they're more similar to tanks. Meaning the best rule is that they should not be claimable (first come first server), currently is just feels cheap getting the Vehicle and losing it for a technicality that is not defined.

forwarded the issue to our forums.

Tank Squad do not need AT Vehicles because they are having Tanks.

AT Vehicle belong to the APC Squad cause they need something to defend the IFV and Personell Carrier.

Exactly the way I see it, mariachi. Did someone want to use AT vehicle in Tank squad, really?

'[NEW wrote:Elmariachi;2080995']Tank Squad do not need AT Vehicles because they are having Tanks.

AT Vehicle belong to the APC Squad cause they need something to defend the IFV and Personell Carrier.

Elmariachi, I'm not saying which squad the AT-Vehicle should belong or not, Ill accept any choice, I'm just reporting it feels cheep being demanded to obey a rule that does not exist - AT Vehicle belong to the APC .

Also just like your argument is invalid by the CAS/AAV situation I would prefer the AT-Vehicles being first come first server.

This issue is discussed on our forum and there will be a formal answer by one of our PR forum representatives.

I would like you to carry the discussion over there.

Please provide the link to the thread. Couldn't find it, Bloody.

Discussion is only for allies as of now

Cleaned thread on request. Stay on topic

The map choices are really disappointing lately. First off the amount of Op. Marlin is way to high. Stop putting it in votes even if you want to play an urban map. There are enough alternatives (inb4 too much Muttrah now ). The second thing were the map yesterday night. You player Khamisiyah LRG, Lashkar and then Kashan LRG. Immense boredom for anyone that wanted to have some infantry rounds that day.

One of the best PR servers. Competent administration, teamplay is great, good server rules and enforcement.

Downside are the map votes are pretty bad at times. Marlin and Muttrah are set much too often, and from my experience, we don't play enough insurgency.