Page 5 of 8
Posted: 2007-11-06 18:54
by CareBear
*loads up the tester build...... selects muttrah v2.... loads map*
what? what you guys looking at?
Posted: 2007-11-06 18:55
by Outlawz7
SethLive! wrote:rhino for dictator!
All hail and live long o mighty mapping tyrant, that is Whino
Posted: 2007-11-06 19:16
by supahpingi
[R-PUB]bosco wrote:This is a MAP UPDATE, why the hell do you people talk about vehicles?
What i meant was: are there any new vehicles in this map that where not in the 1st version like an cobra or apc's.
Posted: 2007-11-06 19:17
by D4rk_l0rdBR
Nice work Rhino!!! Everyone who played in 0.5 really wish Muttrah again in the maplist and now they will have with upgrades. Thks
Posted: 2007-11-06 19:36
by bosco_
supahpingi wrote:What i meant was: are there any new vehicles in this map that where not in the 1st version like an cobra or apc's.
Ahh ok, sorry about my rant, it just seemed like people are never happy with what they get
.
Posted: 2007-11-06 19:39
by Morgan
Looks hot let's hope it can top some of the amazing rounds i had in .5 on Muttrah v1
Still want Quinling more though (WOOP WOOP Brits!)
Posted: 2007-11-06 19:44
by Rhino
dunno why you guys refer to .5 muttrah soo much. Muttrah was best in .32 where it first came out, cos it then fitted PR perfectly
in .5 PR has by that time just out grew muttrah, gameplay was still good but nothing like it was in .32
but MC2 should now be big enough for .7, maybe too big
Posted: 2007-11-06 23:14
by Hotrod525
[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:dunno why you guys refer to .5 muttrah soo much. Muttrah was best in .32 where it first came out, cos it then fitted PR perfectly
in .5 PR has by that time just out grew muttrah, gameplay was still good but nothing like it was in .32
but MC2 should now be big enough for .7, maybe too big
Give us enought Helicopter to make an hard air assault like the first version and it will be fine...
i remember seen 18 guyz heading the port in little bird...and the mec waiting them in the crane... that was awesome
Posted: 2007-11-07 02:52
by J. Skaggs
Yess my favorite map from .3 is back and better than ever! Great job Rhino!
Posted: 2007-11-07 03:27
by DarkTalon
will this still be an aerial and infantry map? or since it is bigger will we see some LAVs or other amphibious vehicles in muttrah?
Posted: 2007-11-07 08:33
by Rhino
DarkTalon wrote:will this still be an aerial and infantry map? or since it is bigger will we see some LAVs or other amphibious vehicles in muttrah?
as the map is bigger expect there to be more equipment like LAVs. The main of course of the map will be the same as the old muttrah, about choppers and infantry.
Posted: 2007-11-07 08:35
by Outlawz7
Do MEC get any reinforcements, like a convoy of BTR90s or Tunguskas?
Posted: 2007-11-07 08:46
by Rhino
Outlawz wrote:Do MEC get any reinforcements, like a convoy of BTR90s or Tunguskas?
you will have to wait and see.
Posted: 2007-11-07 14:04
by -=TB=-Tobakfromcuba
beside the things said about the map here before;looking at all the streets and houses i smell a hell of a rallypoint-search
Posted: 2007-11-07 14:52
by hx.bjoffe
Can you say anything about ~ how many CPs you'll devide the city into?
Or is that also a "wait and see"?
Posted: 2007-11-07 14:59
by Rhino
hx.bjoffe wrote:Can you say anything about ~ how many CPs you'll devide the city into?
Or is that also a "wait and see"?
its also wait and see
Posted: 2007-11-07 15:01
by jayceon515
Outlawz wrote:Do MEC get any reinforcements, like a convoy of BTR90s or Tunguskas?
This map isn't exactly 100% balanced and adding mobile AA or MEC APC will make it almost impossible for the USMC to get to the city ground alive.
Posted: 2007-11-07 15:03
by Rhino
jayceon515 wrote:This map isn't exactly 100% balanced
think the word you are looking for is a asymmetrically balanced?
Posted: 2007-11-07 15:10
by pasfreak
lol...no more swimming to the carrier i guess..
i remember on v1 muttrah I could always convince half our team to come with me and swim..and then we would take over the carrier
Posted: 2007-11-07 15:11
by hx.bjoffe
[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:think the word you are looking for is a sympathetically balanced?
sympathetically?
Think the word you're looking for is
symetrically, no?
