Page 5 of 6

Posted: 2007-12-21 01:58
by fOgGy
SSSSVVVVVEEEEEEETTTTTT!!!!!! ;)

Posted: 2007-12-21 02:06
by Ironcomatose
I was just wondering, what will be the dog fighting skills of this bird?? Should a pilot flying this even attempt to engage or is it bad enough that you best run? You dont have to give me details but just a vague answer will be nice :)

Posted: 2007-12-21 02:09
by Viper5
ironcomatose wrote:I was just wondering, what will be the dog fighting skills of this bird?? Should a pilot flying this even attempt to engage or is it bad enough that you best run? You dont have to give me details but just a vague answer will be nice :)
Since it will be a ground attack aircraft analogous to A10, Su25, etc. I'd imagine it would also have somewhat similar handling

Posted: 2007-12-21 02:11
by Ironcomatose
Viper5 wrote:Since it will be a ground attack aircraft analogous to A10, Su25, etc. I'd imagine it would also have somewhat similar handling
I see how that would make sense in game but i doubt that the harrier flies like an A-10 IRL.

Posted: 2007-12-21 02:48
by Viper5
Yeah me too. Just takin a guess. I'd prolly aniticipate a reduced payload/destructive ability but better maneuverability.

Posted: 2007-12-21 04:34
by Rhino
ironcomatose wrote:I see how that would make sense in game but i doubt that the harrier flies like an A-10 IRL.
the harrier will have its own flight physics, for a start it has VTOL :p

it will be armed with afew AA missiles but they will only be for self defence like the A-10.

Posted: 2007-12-21 05:13
by Eddie Baker
ironcomatose wrote:I was just wondering, what will be the dog fighting skills of this bird?? Should a pilot flying this even attempt to engage or is it bad enough that you best run? You dont have to give me details but just a vague answer will be nice :)
Well, it will be at a bit of a disadvantage because it has no gun. It will have two short range AAMs, though.

Posted: 2007-12-21 06:35
by CAS_117
I wouldn't go chasing any MiG's in a harrier. And what the hell is a MiG-26? Are the Russians at it again?

Posted: 2007-12-21 07:00
by Vlade.the_medic
Wow this is gonna be nice...

Posted: 2007-12-21 09:24
by G.Drew
'[R-DEV wrote:Stigger;555376']Good point, cos you just don't know what page a dev is going plant those updates! :wink:


Created new1000LB Paveway II guided bomb.

Fins flip out on drop.

Fuel tanks and sidewinders.

Last update before christmas. 8-)

Image

Image
oh.my.god


Caboose: i couldnt find it either, so i just got the 25 and 27
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-25
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan_MiG-27

Posted: 2007-12-21 09:46
by UK_Force
Viper5 wrote:Since it will be a ground attack aircraft analogous to A10, Su25, etc. I'd imagine it would also have somewhat similar handling

The Harrier (Medium Ground Attack) does not compare to the A10 or SU25 (Heavy Ground Attack), at all, its an extremely Agile plane ;-)



.

Posted: 2007-12-21 09:51
by UK_Force
$kelet0r wrote:IRL the Harrier is not much good at close air support :p
Obsolete imo

Wrong, I have and still do control Harriers as an FAC, in fact I have controlled more Harriers than anything else tbh.


So not sure where you got that from ?

Posted: 2007-12-21 09:57
by Vlade.the_medic
I hope its not personaly, I loved the A-10 its too nice of a plane to be ousted....

Posted: 2007-12-21 10:01
by Rhino
Vlade.the_medic wrote:I hope its not personaly, I loved the A-10 its too nice of a plane to be ousted....
A-10 = US AF jet

Harrier GR9 = RAF/RN jet.

Posted: 2007-12-21 10:02
by G.Drew
[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:A-10 = US AF jet

Harrier GR9 = RAF/RN jet.
hence the Royal Navy FAA markings on the plane

Posted: 2007-12-21 19:44
by Viper5
[R-DEV]UK_Force wrote:The Harrier (Medium Ground Attack) does not compare to the A10 or SU25 (Heavy Ground Attack), at all, its an extremely Agile plane ;-)



.
I'm aware of that, although one could argue that The A10 is Medium Ground Attack while the Harrier is multi-role, leaving the heavy to something like the F117 and AC130

I was talking in terms of PR and its role.

Posted: 2007-12-22 10:01
by Bob_Marley
[R-CON]caboose wrote:I wouldn't go chasing any MiG's in a harrier. And what the hell is a MiG-26? Are the Russians at it again?
It doesn't exist, all MiGs have odd numbers.

And looking at that pic, would I be right in thinking that its only ground attack abilities in PR are going to be coming from 4 laser guided bombs? No rockets, brimstones or maveriks? (ah well, better than the 4 dumb bombs on the Fantan, I guess.)

Posted: 2007-12-22 10:05
by Rhino
[R-MOD]Bob_Marley wrote:And looking at that pic, would I be right in thinking that its only ground attack abilities in PR are going to be coming from 4 laser guided bombs? No rockets, brimstones or maveriks? (ah well, better than the 4 dumb bombs on the Fantan, I guess.)
or maybe stigger hasn't finished all the ordinance yet :p

Posted: 2007-12-22 10:08
by Bob_Marley
W00t.

I was worried we'd have another Fantan on our hands, hopefully not, now.

Oh yeah, about the Fantan armament...



:p

Posted: 2007-12-22 17:56
by G.Drew
oh god ur strapping a JDAM to the Fantan :razz: