Project Reality Forums

Liquid_Cow wrote:Arjan, just out of curiosity, why would you make such a request? If you don't like this thread don't read it. There is still an active discussion of the merites of CQB in the game going on here. If the Mod's thought it needed to be closed they would have, believe me they do it all the time.

Becouse its my thread?
The discussion started suddenly again after the thread being atleast 2 months dead its old, and my goal at this thread was just a opinion of people what they like to see in PR the most, and so they can show the dev's their opinion. and my goal has been reached. done.

And ive never said i dont like reading it? where do you get that from?

someone should make a 1980's cold war crisis version of pr - hardcore ironsight action

A mix of both
A scope in QCB should get you killed unless you have had time to zero in.

and Iron sights should not work at long range ATM you can use iron sights very well at 450-500M

Yea urban CQB maps will be VERY nice, even with a few choppers, i like big maps if they have a lot of planes/helicopters.

I personally like to be in a tank and give fire support. I also like to fight at very long ranges. I like the marcro-scale of tank battles because I like the strategy on that scale. However, CQB firefights are very intense and fast. Unlike a tank battle, which can take anywhere from 1 sec to 30 min, CQB can be fun for instant action. I do like both. I do wish that there would be a return of a large operation ground battle (kashan or qinling) in the next patch (instead of all the insurgency). Personally, i would like to see a huge map with only ground vehicles (tanks, apcs, and support vehicles) and transport helicopters. Bsically a 12 v 12 tank battle with other vehicles (no air power other than transport heli). I hope they make something like this.

i think a mix becos then we can have a little bit of something for every1 we all hav our preferences

I dont think PR should focus in catagories. I think PR should forcus on more realistic, team-based, yet flowing gameplay, wich I feel it pretty much provides, within its restrictions.

Yet I do get the feeling that perhaps PR has focused slightly more so on CQB and mid ranged in recent releases (very much needed so might I add) and that long range has suffered slightly because of this.

Still, this last release has been a great result for me.

...mongol...

Jonny wrote:all, in the same map.

EJOD is a nice example.

And as said above me, more flow into the game (hard to do with this engine tho).

I guess a mix of both works fine, but it's still possible to make a 'small' 4km if you put the main bases only 1km apart. The point is, it feels more realistic not having those boundaries even if you probably wouldn't go outside them much anyway. Still, the advantage of maps with a smaller area of terrain I suppose is that they take up less memory, and they're quicker to make.

4 km is to much, unless it is a Vehicle focuss map,
just put more 2 km maps that 4 km.
also more Transports will be nice.

ahhh one more thing, make the Anti tank and the Light Anti tank up to 10 kits per faction, each one, also AA kit 5 per faction, i rarely see a soldir firing a Anti tank weopow, and when i going to pick up one they say all the kits are alerdy in use, dawn,

I like CQB the best.

But middle range, and sometimes long range is fun.

I prefer close in action - I hate when my bullets miss.
More urban and desert action please

My opinion is big veichle based maps and tight urban CQB maps.

I would love a mix of all!