Re: [Weapon] F88 Aus Styer
Posted: 2008-07-25 07:56
ahahah yeh
There are two options that I can think of. The first one is just having an automatic firemode which will force players to lightly tap their mouses to shoot single shots. The other option is having both single shot and automatic but no sound or animation for changing between the two.Sgt.Trip wrote:but for the purpose of a game its gonna have to be a button we press to change the rate of fire!
cause we can't make a half mouse click be semi and a full mouse click be auto.... not gonna work...![]()
+1 for this idea[R-CON]nedlands1 wrote:The first one is just having an automatic firemode which will force players to lightly tap their mouses to shoot single shots.
yeah the marksman rifle should be Styer AUG LSW as its known, with bipod, longer barrel and ACOG scope, similar to what the L86A2 LSW is to the standard L85A2 btw anyone considered the AICW? google it and hava look[R-CON]nedlands1 wrote:No. Ideally it would be the heavy barrelled version with the bipod not unlike the L86A2 LSW.
Does the Australian Army even use the F88 LSW? If so, who is issued it?triggerhappY|PR wrote:yeah the marksman rifle should be Styer AUG LSW as its known, with bipod, longer barrel and ACOG scope, similar to what the L86A2 LSW is to the standard L85A2 btw anyone considered the AICW? google it and hava look
YES lol i am not the only one who thinks this lol (maybe a little bi est tho lol)Truism wrote: Not having Signallers in an ADF faction just seems... Odd given their incredible importance in ADF doctrine, and the apparent absence of specially Designated Marksmen....
I'm not sure exactly what a signaller is, but I'm assuming that it's a soldier dedicated to radio communications. Would it be possible to separate the SL's ability to lay rallies from their ability to talk w/ the CO?Truism wrote: Not having Signallers in an ADF faction just seems... Odd given their incredible importance in ADF doctrine, and the apparent absence of specially Designated Marksmen....
Yes, you are right a sig is a radio operator.ReadMenace wrote:I'm not sure exactly what a signaller is, but I'm assuming that it's a soldier dedicated to radio communications. Would it be possible to separate the SL's ability to lay rallies from their ability to talk w/ the CO?
-REad
I'm uncertain if this has been asked in another topic but what kit might receive the M4 now that the spec-ops class has been removed?[R-CON]nedlands1 wrote:An M4 of some description will be the carbine for the spec-ops class
No kit now unless the decision is made to make an SASR or commando faction.Snazz wrote:I'm uncertain if this has been asked in another topic but what kit might receive the M4 now that the spec-ops class has been removed?
Assuming the M4 is used by regular units in the ADF.
Just regulars atm. I for one don't want just a reskinned US Army.stozzcheese wrote:ahh wonderful.
im just sad that theres no sasr/cdo element now =(
one question though, most of our deployed troops in afghanistan are special forces (sasr/4rar/2cdo), ingame, are you fellows just implementing the regular army? that is if theres afghan based maps (thought i saw one being made)
cheers
+1[R-CON]nedlands1 wrote:Just regulars atm. I for one don't want just a reskinned US Army.