Project Reality Forums

agree, i have noted this before, the repeating gradiend is simply wrong, it should not be there, acutally the color should be solid and all change should be in the spectacular map

[Update] Trijicon Acog TA01 Smooths+ UV maps



The UV map may looks like shit. It's because i'm using it on a 512x512 resolution. The people may think that is too smaller and shity, but the whole gun was maded on that size.

Hmm, why have a 2nd ACOG? why not just use PR's? would be better in every way unless this one is significantly different.

it would look much cooler if the acog seamed to be in the same coulor as the gun, and mafia probably makes the acog look better than the one in use allready

[R-CON]Z-trooper wrote:Hmm, why have a 2nd ACOG? why not just use PR's? would be better in every way unless this one is significantly different.

ye, it is a really, really bad move to make a 2nd ACOG for not just quality reasons but also performance too. the more models that share the same UVs and textures the better.

Well, i'm just doing what i'm ordered to do....

MaFiA_do_OsAmA wrote:Well, i'm just doing what i'm ordered to do....

hmm i think i forgot to tell you that we already have one ingame so no need to make it! Sorry for not letting you know before!

Another perfect timming....

I am a little confused... wasn't the flashlight supposed to sit on the side of the Hk416, becouse in RL it would be much easier destroyed while underneath?

or have i missed something?

and is it possible in the bf2 engine to have the flashlight working?... not saying it should, there is no real use for that, but just wondering if it is possible

H.sta wrote:and is it possible in the bf2 engine to have the flashlight working?... not saying it should, there is no real use for that, but just wondering if it is possible

From what I've understood, yes it is possible, but it'll look like shit.

BF2+dynamic lights=Crysis on Windows 95 era machine

Well, i don't make any models, so ask KP about the flashlight position. In my opinion, this is the best place to put it on, as the side of the gun haves the RIS plates.

MaFiA_do_OsAmA wrote:Well, i don't make any models, so ask KP about the flashlight position. In my opinion, this is the best place to put it on, as the side of the gun haves the RIS plates.

The flashlight have been a huge discussion lately and at the end we decided to have the flashlight together with the H&K 416!

[R-CON]halvor1 wrote:The flashlight have been a huge discussion lately and at the end we decided to have the flashlight together with the H&K 416!

Yeah, it is good to have it, but wasn't it supposed to sit on the side?

halvor... screaming is bad for your throat...(!)

ONtopic: on most pic's i've seen, the soldiers have the flashlights on the left or right side of the rifle.. not under...

Why having a flashlight onthe gun when it does not work in the engine anyway?

Agent Parker wrote:Why having a flashlight onthe gun when it does not work in the engine anyway?

1337 factor

Just to have something different then the normal PR gun

maybe to have it even more special- only give it to the specialist kit? (i do not want to start another discussion, i understand there was a big one a while back)

Then I want an Mp3 player on it too. And a beercan holder.

The flashlight can work in BF2 engine with some proper codes. About the position, the people who see it must understand that in the sides of the weapon we have the RIS plates, so, nothing can be over them. And the only flashlight who is on the side of the gun is the ANPEQ, the correct position for the M3X is under it.

EDIT: Talking about the Acog scope version... We will have it on the faction or not?

There is no really usable dynamic lighting in BF2. And there are no maps that are dark anyway.