Project Reality Forums

'[R-DEV wrote:Nickbond592;1081619']A few more SS's then

.....



Epic win Nickbond and Iron.

I wanna play this

'[R-DEV wrote:Nickbond592;1080828']



This - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQLrnN3q ... re=related

NOES! "This video is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions."

But anyway, great looking map

looks great! i cant wait for some more british maps. but i must say i like the brits in the desert better. but this is still great!

flem615 wrote:looks great! i cant wait for some more british maps. but i must say i like the brits in the desert better. but this is still great!

I'd have to agree tbh, but I love the look of this map as well.

I was wondering, what are you gonna do Layer wise?

I assume 16, infantry, 64 full assets....32?

looks good, can't wait to play!

Dr2B Rudd wrote:My only problem that I can see is the city is just

THIS IS CITY < > THIS IS FOREST

there's no smaller buildings between the Forest and city.

Well, that's what these "new cities" of the Soviet Union looked like. If they had a factory or whatever in a remote area of the country they just built a huge amount of similar apartment buildings close by so that the workers would have somewhere to live. Not like the city we westerners are used to, cities that build themselves over time, where every building is unique.

Storm Mama is right, similiar "cities" were build for workers or soldiers in USSR.

Looks great!

Question! can we expect to see a new class of apc for the brits seeing as they currently have 2 classes

Looks amazing

STORM-Mama wrote:Well, that's what these "new cities" of the Soviet Union looked like. If they had a factory or whatever in a remote area of the country they just built a huge amount of similar apartment buildings close by so that the workers would have somewhere to live. Not like the city we westerners are used to, cities that build themselves over time, where every building is unique.

exactly that was the idea.. I based the city off quite a few refs and the initial road plan was actually grozny.. very modified and simplififed of course...

Dr2B Rudd wrote:I'd have to agree tbh, but I love the look of this map as well.

I was wondering, what are you gonna do Layer wise?

I assume 16, infantry, 64 full assets....32?

no idea yet be looking at an asset heavy layer with the militia entrenched in the city with few assets but lots of access to arms...

[R-DEV]IronTaxi wrote:no idea yet be looking at an asset heavy layer with the militia entrenched in the city with few assets but lots of access to arms...

You should put an aircraft carrier on the map, it would wtfsurprise the milita for sure.

Blade.3510 wrote:Question! can we expect to see a new class of apc for the brits seeing as they currently have 2 classes

bulldog would be pretty cool, or a cougar varient. But I expect there will be alot of new content for all teams in PR .9

[R-CON]ReaperMAC wrote:You should put an aircraft carrier on the map, it would wtfsurprise the milita for sure.

And Dinosaur easter eggs.

[R-CON]ReaperMAC wrote:You should put an aircraft carrier on the map, it would wtfsurprise the milita for sure.

yeah and Ill put a mosque on the carrier and say it was capped by insurgents...

yeah.. and ill put the construction crane on the deck too so snipers can snipez from there....yeah yeah...

[R-DEV]IronTaxi wrote:exactly that was the idea.. I based the city off quite a few refs and the initial road plan was actually grozny.. very modified and simplififed of course...

I see. Grozny, together with Pripyat, is one of the most famous examples of this kind of functionalistic way of planning and building cities. Judging from the pictures, you've done a great work of transferring the looks and atmosphere of those Soviet cities to PR! If someone says that the look of the map feels dull or boring and that the architecture is repetive you should think of it as a compliment, because that's what these towns feel like.

By the way, the fact that the map is based on Grozny is yet another argument for having Ivan and his tanks featured on the map. But it's your map, you decide.

STORM-Mama wrote:I see. Grozny, together with Pripyat, is one of the most famous examples of this kind of functionalistic way of planning and building cities. Judging from the pictures, you've done a great work of transferring the looks and atmosphere of those Soviet cities to PR! If someone says that the look of the map feels dull or boring and that the architecture is repetive you should think of it as a compliment, because that's what these towns feel like.

By the way, the fact that the map is based on Grozny is yet another argument for having Ivan and his tanks featured on the map. But it's your map, you decide.

Exactly! give this to russians, brits can get iron ridge

How big is it?