Project Reality Forums

I've been watching some older PR videos on youtube. I like the M16 more, due to it's animations. What do you guys think visually looks better?

M4 with EO Tech
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXqWDvm--cM

M16
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xe8CRYReRM8&

I'd like the M16 if the sight was less blocky. As it is the EO Tech cures that.

I'm not a gun person but have never liked the M4 to look at.. So I vote M16..

PR:Vietnam should sort out my little fetish for an ironsights battlefield though (don't discuss PR:V kthxbai).

iirc M16 and M4 have the same animations, dont quote me on that but i'm sure someone said that on this forums

Out of the 2 i prefer M4, simply because i am forced to use it whenever i play PR as Americans really (SL)

M4 model is pretty rad. I'd like to see the Marine officer kit request get an M16A4 with EOTech.

M4 looks weird in first person to me, looks too... Stubby? Probably just the perspective but still. Also like the M4/M16s in older versions much more since they lacked the ugly grips.

dtacs wrote:I'd like to see the Marine officer kit request get an M16A4 with EOTech.

Me too. And maybe have a couple of kits (like HAT and AA or alternate AT and AP or something along these lines) use the old M16/M4 without the grips? For variety's sake? Please? D: Goddamn I hate those grips.

If you don't have grips, you aren't highspeedlowdraggoodtogo.

The front ironsights need to be thinned btw.

Eotech, carbine rifle, gribs, WHAT THE F*CK?
M4 just looks too SF.

I say M16.
I want good old unreliable M16 that you never know if its gonny work or not lol.

I wish the M16A4 w/ EOtech was in the game, but I don't think that is gonna happen because the MA's for the USMC faction said M16's dont get EOtechs IIRC. Which is strange, I have seen many USMC M16's with a variety of optics including the MARS, ACOG 4x, EOtech, Aimpoint M2, and the Trijicon Reflex sight.