Project Reality Forums

Not sure why the americans get such a smaller and weaker armour force compared to the chinese on this map.

The chinese APCs get far bigger guns, and are amphibious compared to the strykers. the vn-3s even have bigger guns than the strykers. The bradley and the chinese tank are not equivalent, the bradley has to stop with it's ATGMs out, and has bar less armour.

This map gets ruined by the armour differences. The americans need 2 more bradleys, a kiowa with hellfires or an abrams.

Just played Chinese on Sisu, OD-S (of course) rushed with the Chinese 30mm across and killed the Bradley within 2 minutes. This isn't taking into account the tank either.

I understand its going for an asymmetrical feel but the fact that the US get a Stryker going up against that much armor is just ludicrous.

Bring back the Kiowa?

Nope. Give the US 3x Strykers, the Chinese 2x WZ551 (30mm) + 1x WZ551A (.50 cal). None of this TOW Humvee/Bradley nonsense.

No point having a tank on a map like Qwai in the first place. It used to have it until the lightmaps were updated, don't know why it was put back in.

Replace the Strykers with LAV's and we should be fine.

That's USMC. Used to be on Qwai then the US Army was completed, who make more sense on an inland map as well.

Change one of the Strykers to an MGS variant

Qwai would be the best map for a Stryker company, hopefully one day we'll see that cause unfortunately the US Army are kind of stale now

Stealthgato wrote:Change one of the Strykers to an MGS variant

all problems instantly solved

the US need to play defensively, in order to easily win that is they could until the bradley completely got so nerfed that now its just a loud pile of scrap, the biggest problem with the map is that the bradley needs to stand still for so freaking long, and everyone knows what happens to apcs that stay still for too long

Chinese tank is so lame. Its not even considered a threat. Weak armor and quite weak atgm. But I agree tank is too much for this map. Remove Bradley and balance it with tweaking Chinese armor. But lets not make it too easy for USMC

The Strykers are the biggest problem on this map, the Americans get so many of them but the only piece of armor they can kill are the little VN-3s which, unrealisticly, can also kill the Strykers ( the Stryker is armored against 14.5mm rounds)

Stealthgato wrote:Change one of the Strykers to an MGS variant

MGS totally trumps all enemy apcs, and is able to damage enemy tank, an MGS a bradley and some .50 strykers would be better.

Stealthgato wrote:Change one of the Strykers to an MGS variant

You genius *******

Map is fine. Layout is fine.

Your just playing it wrong.

Sent from my Office using Tapatalk

Wrong? The map is wrong, US should have total supremacy in everything every time, and the chinese should get only UAZ transports. Then it will be balanced.

/sarcasm.

On paper, the PLA have a significant asset advantage over the US on Qwai, but it's an infantryman's map at the end of the day. Basically every vehicle on the map is just waiting to get HATed due to the small size of the battlefield (plus the bridge choke-points) and its myriad hills. So what you've really got - with the exception of the very fast, very small, and very well-armed VN3 - is a bunch of liabilities, not assets.

Changing a few WZ551s over to the .50 cal variant would probably be a good decision however.

ShockUnitBlack wrote:On paper, the PLA have a significant asset advantage over the US on Qwai, but it's an infantryman's map at the end of the day. Basically every vehicle on the map is just waiting to get HATed due to the small size of the battlefield (plus the bridge choke-points) and its myriad hills. So what you've really got - with the exception of the very fast, very small, and very well-armed VN3 - is a bunch of liabilities, not assets.

Changing a few WZ551s over to the .50 cal variant would probably be a good decision however.

nah nah, theres nothing liable about the armour as defensive assets.

Portable.Cougar wrote:Map is fine. Layout is fine.

Your just playing it wrong.

Sent from my Office using Tapatalk

yup no map is ever imbalanced youre just playing it wrong! Why not give the chinese 100 tanks and 50 attack helos? If the americans lose theyre just playing wrong.

40mmrain wrote:yup no map is ever imbalanced youre just playing it wrong! Why not give the chinese 100 tanks and 50 attack helos? If the americans lose theyre just playing wrong.

I lol'd

Agreed with the MGS. Is that a vehicle already in PR?

PricelineNegotiator wrote:I lol'd

Agreed with the MGS. Is that a vehicle already in PR?

Why not AC130?

/facepalm

MaSSive wrote:

Why not AC130?

/facepalm

Dude, this guy is right. We need the AC-130 on Qwai.