Current Health of Project Reality
Posted: 2012-07-13 05:21
In your opinion, what do you think is the current health of PR now? And what do I mean by health? The gameplay particularly the cohesive and efficiency in bonding of players and squadleaders and tactics--not the population base.
With the decommissioning of TacticalGamer due to lack of activity, many of the players that sought haven there for good serious and tactical gameplay through the Battlefield 2 engine and not ArmA2 tried their best in filling that void on other servers. The newly made Serious Pants server also represents this as it suffers the same fate of TG, having a huge difficulty in seeding.
I played on TacticalGamer (prior to that was TexasTeamPlayers and Tactics&Teamwork, both archaic PR servers) for much of my PR history (since v0.5). And now that its gone, I have gotten the chance to reexplore the world of PR outside of TG and found it a bit bleak and a big facepalm to the face. I'm not sure of what are people's definition of "tactical and realistic FPS" or what they saw when they joined PR and filled up these many servers with their vague perspective and often immaturity.
I had never seen griefing, people killing over kits, unprofessional taunting, highly preventable unintentional teamkilling, poor coordination as a whole (the squads and team), bad squadleaders, and etc on such a large scale (for PR standards) when my one and only purpose of me joining Project Reality in the first place was that I was seeking for a place for serious and realistic gameplay aside from all the noise of the mainstream gaming industry where players convert into mindless drones running around with firearms on their hips. I always dreamed of a realistic shooter and I found PR to be a good game to represent this dream.
There are a few servers that are a bit more successful than TG and try to fufill this serious and realistic gameplay but in my opinion, they still need some fine-tuning. There has also been a huge influx of new people. Everyday, I get comments on my YouTube videos of people wanting to know what game it is and they're really all the old videos from TG that I had. And now that it no longer exists, I don't know what is in store for them when they join other servers and quite possibly enjoy PR the wrong way. What is learned will be learned again by the individuals of assimilation as a predisposition, not by what they want to learn or had anticipated.
Anyway, this is just my opinion and I would like to know if others feel the same as I do. I don't know if there is an answer for this, probably not. But as of now, I see a downward future for PR in its realism and all-seriousness. It continues to be a nice game of bonding between good PR buddies but the experience is dramatically lesser as we try to struggle through firefights and battles together. It just becomes all unrealistically frustrating.
"People treat PR now like its a paintball game. It's not like what it used to be."
"... it will never come back. Servers like these will continue to exist because people like it this way. I don't know why..."
With the decommissioning of TacticalGamer due to lack of activity, many of the players that sought haven there for good serious and tactical gameplay through the Battlefield 2 engine and not ArmA2 tried their best in filling that void on other servers. The newly made Serious Pants server also represents this as it suffers the same fate of TG, having a huge difficulty in seeding.
I played on TacticalGamer (prior to that was TexasTeamPlayers and Tactics&Teamwork, both archaic PR servers) for much of my PR history (since v0.5). And now that its gone, I have gotten the chance to reexplore the world of PR outside of TG and found it a bit bleak and a big facepalm to the face. I'm not sure of what are people's definition of "tactical and realistic FPS" or what they saw when they joined PR and filled up these many servers with their vague perspective and often immaturity.
I had never seen griefing, people killing over kits, unprofessional taunting, highly preventable unintentional teamkilling, poor coordination as a whole (the squads and team), bad squadleaders, and etc on such a large scale (for PR standards) when my one and only purpose of me joining Project Reality in the first place was that I was seeking for a place for serious and realistic gameplay aside from all the noise of the mainstream gaming industry where players convert into mindless drones running around with firearms on their hips. I always dreamed of a realistic shooter and I found PR to be a good game to represent this dream.
There are a few servers that are a bit more successful than TG and try to fufill this serious and realistic gameplay but in my opinion, they still need some fine-tuning. There has also been a huge influx of new people. Everyday, I get comments on my YouTube videos of people wanting to know what game it is and they're really all the old videos from TG that I had. And now that it no longer exists, I don't know what is in store for them when they join other servers and quite possibly enjoy PR the wrong way. What is learned will be learned again by the individuals of assimilation as a predisposition, not by what they want to learn or had anticipated.
Anyway, this is just my opinion and I would like to know if others feel the same as I do. I don't know if there is an answer for this, probably not. But as of now, I see a downward future for PR in its realism and all-seriousness. It continues to be a nice game of bonding between good PR buddies but the experience is dramatically lesser as we try to struggle through firefights and battles together. It just becomes all unrealistically frustrating.
"People treat PR now like its a paintball game. It's not like what it used to be."
"... it will never come back. Servers like these will continue to exist because people like it this way. I don't know why..."