Project Reality Forums

Pretty much everything you have suggested etc is on the design plan: https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f562-p ... -plan.html

IvanDrago wrote:1. incrementation of a Super Puma or Chinook for Argentino Bando ....

The puma we don't have a model for yet and an Argentine Chinook is low priority but is on the design plan.

IvanDrago wrote:2. Because of FN-MAG gunner with the Argentine Huey door ....

I have not seen a single ref that suggests that the UH-1H had any door guns on it during the Falklands War.

IvanDrago wrote:3. Uniforms more real to Argentina, Jackets and medical uniform ...

They are based on what most of the Argentine troops war during the falklands war, however if you feel you can do better your more than welcome to give it a shot.

IvanDrago wrote:4.incrementacionn of vietnam model M16 for Special Forces Kit. ( ambos bandos )

an "1982 SAS" team is in the design plan but very low priority since they can only go on the Skirmish 16 layer.

If your asking for a vBF2 style "SF kit" which a player can request or w/e and then fight along side normal kits, that just isn't going to happen.

IvanDrago wrote:5. incrementation of flags on the island where the Pucara, Isla Pucara.

You want a flag on the minimap for pebble island? May do in a future release, we felt it might be best not to have a flag their otherwise it might become more of a target for air strikes.

IvanDrago wrote:1. But the other helicopter inplementacion for Argentine side is very important, could be a White Huey Red Cross (Medic), who was one of those who was used in the Falklands or a Gazelle ...

We already have a Gazelle in, but only on the 128 and 16 AAS layers as per this topic: https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f196-p ... e-7-a.html

Also a "Medevac" chopper is pointless in PR seeing as you can treat all wounds 100% on the field, unlike in r/l.

IvanDrago wrote:2. Implementation of Special Troop night vision and Official ...

2. I did not mean to a flag in the Pucara, if not several flags on the island that is the pucara ...

Both of these make no sense...

IvanDrago wrote:3. L1AP (into English) with wooden stock texture like the image, the more realistic ...

Do you mean a wooden stock FM FAL? While yes there where very few about, which where the old FM FALs, the majority of the FM FALs had plastic stocks.


Try and spot the wooden FM FALs out of these piles of Argentine weapons




If your on about the L1A1 SLR, all where plastic stocks.

Also having a wooden stock version would also hardly be worth the memory used for the odd weapon...

IvanDrago wrote:Huey FN MAG

Interesting. May consider it seeing as we have the mounts for the weapons that we can't get rid of.

Edited my above post.

IvanDrago wrote:2. the implementations of night vision for night maps, as well as pilots and officers, is very important, an important role in tube malvinas ....

Pilots yes in time I hope they will get NVGs, just at the moment the night vision (NV) code is broken.

I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that all officer kits should get NVGs. 99% of ground troops in the war didn't have any NV of any kind and relied on illumination shots etc.

IvanDrago;1825784 wrote:3. Huey Medic, and is very nesesario another helicopter to Argentina, England has 2 Helicopter

[quote=""'[R-DEV"]Rhino;1825782']Also a "Medevac" chopper is pointless in PR seeing as you can treat all wounds 100% on the field, unlike in r/l.

Argentina already have a max of two UH-1Hs to spawn on that single spawn point on most layers (128 I think its 3?). Some games I've seen both choppers sitting on Stanley airport and no one using them...

Just because GB has the "possibility of more choppers", providing the Atlantic Conveyor is not destroyed and that the Brits get the Chinooks off of it, doesn't give any good reason for giving the Argentines any more choppers. In the real war the UK had far more choppers and they used them far more as well, even with the AC being destroyed. Ignoring that, the Brits have much further to fly from the carrier or AC to land and back to reload, slowing down their chopper turnaround massively ingame. Argentina on the other hand only have to fly to and from Stanley, which is nothing like as far to reload etc. As such gameplay wise, it balances out.

[quote="IvanDrago""]4. is planned to create these landing craft? , model D-Day Of Normandy

[/quote]

Hardly any point of one. and the LCU Mk9 is very different from anything used in D-Day...

Hence why I said 99% of troops didn't have NV. Two guys wearing NV isn't anything like enough to even justify giving one kit ingame NV.

NVG's first brit use was with helicopter pilots I'm sure no fixed wing had them.

Dunno about Brit ground forces though I'd be suprised they just had to eat carrots (old WW2 joke).

IvanDrago wrote:I'm not suggesting that they were of the soldiers, if not the kit of an officer, the photos are officers (lieutenants), I think an officer deve have night vision is very important

If you have hard evidence to support this I may consider it but it would give the Argentines a significant advantage ingame over the Brits if this was given as the SL would just spot targets, then put down an attack marker and the rest of the squad would just open up on that.

IvanDrago wrote:One last question, I'm interested in the texture editing to help the Falklands mod, if you have a guide it agradesco ....

https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f189-m ... s-max.html

Not a very good source, probably best you post a new topic in the community modding forums asking for help.

PLODDITHANLEY wrote:NVG's first brit use was with helicopter pilots I'm sure no fixed wing had them.

Ye, I know during the war their was a few chopper night sorties (such as the Raid on Pebble Island) which I'm guessing the pilots used NVGs for, dunno about the Harrier pilots or the Argentine pilots but haven't heard anything about any night sorties from fixed wings, although I would be tempted to add NVGs to all pilots, not only that we don't have separate chopper and fixed wing pilot kits, but also since its pretty much impossible to fly at night right now hehe.

IvanDrago wrote:Dunno about Brit ground forces though I'd be suprised they just had to eat carrots (old WW2 joke).

hehe, no radar here, just carrots

Wasn't a lot of NVG, maybe 1 or 2 over 120 men....
The exception was the IM (Marines) BIM5, they had:
There were 3 classes of NVG: for head ("Goggles"), for FAL ("Litton") and for machinegun 12,7 ("Mizza").
The Company of Machinegun 12,7 had the following numbers of NVG:
- 1a Seccion con el BIM 5: 3 NVG Mizza. 12,7 y 6 Googles
-2a Seccion (-) (Mte Longdon): 3 NVG Mizza. 12,7, 5 NVG Litton y 12
googles
-3a Seccion con el RI 25: 3 NVG Mizza 12,7, 2 NVG litton y 11 NVG googles

The GA4 (Grupo de Artilleria 4) had 6 Googles.

The RI7 had 3 googles, 1 per section (or company, the same), so... officers and guards only.

The RI4 only had observation googles, not fitted to aim. more or less 4 or 5.

The RI12 has no register of getting any NVG. they was in Pradera del Ganso (Goose Green)

And its more or less the same in all the EA companys, 1 per section (every RI was over 3 sections)

There was also, in the Apostadero Naval, one observation NVG, it was like a binocular with night vision.

There really are some mess over the night vision over the war, most of regular soldier only saw it "to look how it was like", was most used for Guardsmen and Officers to aim fire.

Do you mean a wooden stock FM FAL? While yes there where very few about, which where the old FM FALs, the majority of the FM FALs had plastic stocks.


Try and spot the wooden FM FALs out of these piles of Argentine weapons






Prisoners of war were conscripts few officers and the shooters of that time were not on the islands so you can not find the wood spoil in the mountain of FAL, They fought with children not with officers. With the uniforms theme it would be great if there were the real uniforms





Oficial:

I am not entirely convinced the argies didnt just paint them black to look tacticool.