Project Reality Forums

A couple of players on CIA wanted to see how it turned out, LOL, catastrophic.

Here is the video:

Project Reality T-55 FAIL - YouTube

I love the commentary as Superhornet and I blunder to our deaths.

We managed to kill it 10 minutes later with the spandy. Superhornet has a picture of me on the wreck.

I actually hit that challenger with a HAT earlier, it must have RTB'd, was hoping he didnt and the T62 would finish it off

This is T-62 actually
Learn materiel...

Staring at the challenger instead of doing something productive, seems like you are a great player yourself. God forbid you should grab an AT kit and help your tank out, or even go shoot the enemy supporting their tank standing around like idiots themselves. I see now why DEV's are removing binoculars.

=HCM= Shwedor wrote:Staring at the challenger instead of doing something productive, seems like you are a great player yourself. God forbid you should grab an AT kit and help your tank out, or even go shoot the enemy supporting their tank standing around like idiots themselves. I see now why DEV's are removing binoculars.

There was nothing that could be done except watch. No crates or anything around, lol.

=HCM= Shwedor wrote:Staring at the challenger instead of doing something productive, seems like you are a great player yourself. God forbid you should grab an AT kit and help your tank out, or even go shoot the enemy supporting their tank standing around like idiots themselves. I see now why DEV's are removing binoculars.

lol hit a challenger with a LAT? Going to take a warrior with your rifle next, bro?

40mmrain wrote:lol hit a challenger with a LAT? Going to take a warrior with your rifle next, bro?

Where did I ever say he had to use a LAT? AT can mean HAT, LAT, artillery IED, etc.
But by all means, continue on with your fail troll attempts. He could have easily shot the guys on the corner of the building he was looking at through his binoculars as well. And for the record, a LAT can kill a Challenger.

Congrats on your lack of reading comprehension, and observational skills bro. Title: CIA server, thus DB mod, thus 1 HAT. In my post earlier, I stated I was using the HAT kit at the same time as this.

It's ironic that you come into the thread to call out cozmic, but instead you are the fool.

=HCM= Shwedor wrote:Where did I ever say he had to use a LAT? AT can mean HAT, LAT, artillery IED, etc.
But by all means, continue on with your fail troll attempts. He could have easily shot the guys on the corner of the building he was looking at through his binoculars as well. And for the record, a LAT can kill a Challenger.

As he zoomed with the binos, the infantry came around the building, then he had to hide to avoid the tank seeing him. Also, worth the video.

40mmrain wrote:Congrats on your lack of reading comprehension, and observational skills bro. Title: CIA server, thus DB mod, thus 1 HAT. In my post earlier, I stated I was using the HAT kit at the same time as this.

It's ironic that you come into the thread to call out cozmic, but instead you are the fool.

And how many artillery IED's? And the Challenger has a rather slow turret rotation, he could have easily capped a Brit and been safe inside before the CR2 fired.

=HCM= Shwedor wrote:Staring at the challenger instead of doing something productive, seems like you are a great player yourself. God forbid you should grab an AT kit and help your tank out, or even go shoot the enemy supporting their tank standing around like idiots themselves. I see now why DEV's are removing binoculars.

xCoZmic_Crunchx wrote:There was nothing that could be done except watch. No crates or anything around, lol.

=HCM= Shwedor wrote:Where did I ever say he had to use a LAT? AT can mean HAT, LAT, artillery IED, etc.
But by all means, continue on with your fail troll attempts. He could have easily shot the guys on the corner of the building he was looking at through his binoculars as well. And for the record, a LAT can kill a Challenger.

Pvt.LHeureux wrote:As he zoomed with the binos, the infantry came around the building, then he had to hide to avoid the tank seeing him. Also, worth the video.

=HCM= Shwedor wrote:And how many artillery IED's? And the Challenger has a rather slow turret rotation, he could have easily capped a Brit and been safe inside before the CR2 fired.

THE TRAGEDY OF LOST OPPORTUNITIES.

That was one of the thousands of Dragonfly rounds that were played in PR history, there's always something you could have done differently in retrospect. Let it go.

Cant tell what happened in the beginning but the T62 could not kill the Challenger from 0:15, it has a 17 second reload. 62 should have just gtfo.

T-62 can't outrun the Challenger either, funny thing is the best bet for a T-62 to kill a Challenger on that map is from a distance undetected lol.