Project Reality Forums

Darman1138 wrote:I'd be annoyed if I don't have nametags. Example:

Soldier #1: "Soldier #2, behind you!"
Soldier #2: "What're you talking about? I'm not even spawned in."
Soldier #1: "Wait, who am I looking at?"
Soldier #3: "I don't know. How do I know who you're looking at if I don't know who you are?"
Soldier #1: "I'm the guy with the Rifleman kit."
Soldier #3: "I see two guys with Rifleman kits. Move your mouse around so I know which one you are."

I don't know. I just see mass confusion coming from this. Especially when two friendly squads are near each other and they don't know who they're supposed to be following or who's in their squad. In real life, we all have distinct faces and bodies to tell each other apart. In PR we all share very similar character models. I don't think getting rid of the nametags is a good idea.

100p are way too much on 2km maps. Most maps focus the battle only on a few hotspots, therefore causing way too much chaos. Together with the new RPs you have huge amounts of contact the whole time coming from every direction.

And I thought you guys would have fixed the name bug. Otherwise I would have never implemented that. But for some reason its still there? Is it fixable? If not then you either have to remove all nametags (which I actually do not recommend, read why after this sentence)or do not implement 100p at all.

Do not tell me to double check enemies. ofc it would be much more realistic and such. But it is impossible to be done with the gameplay that PR provides right now. And it will be even more impossible with the RPs and the new deviation in 1.0.

Gameplay is too fast. In one moment everything is quite and suddenly on intitial contact all hell breaks loose on you. People starting to rush INSIDE your squads positions and you simply have no time to actually double check an enemy who appears freaking right between you and your mate. In PR you get into very close firefights way too often. If PR would be 80% distance firefights and 20% CQB, this would be possible I think. But right now its 80% very close contatcs and 20% on distance. Usually those 20% happen on intial contact and after that at least one part of the squad tries to get closer to them by flanking or whatever...where we get to 80% CQB again. And with that much CQB firefights it is bullshit if you do not see the names of friendlies. Our defensive positions got rushed by small 2-3 men squads all the time causing so much confusion and chaos. We were mostly busy killing ourselves than killing the enemy.

Now ppl will say: Come one, everyone who played PR for somewhile can see the difference between an enemy and a friendly. No you cannot if you have less than a second to decide whether the guys who just ran around a corner into you is hostile or not. The enemy does not have that problem, he knows that he is surrounded by enemies and kills everyone he sees without hesitating. So if you hesitate and wait one more second to identify the guy, you are dead. No-Nametags will never ever work in PR unless we only play big 4km desert maps with no possibilites of CQB firefights.

Spook wrote: Now ppl will say: Come one, everyone who played PR for somewhile can see the difference between an enemy and a friendly. No you cannot if you have less than a second to decide whether the guys who just ran around a corner into you is hostile or not. The enemy does not have that problem, he knows that he is surrounded by enemies and kills everyone he sees without hesitating. So if you hesitate and wait one more second to identify the guy, you are dead. No-Nametags will never ever work in PR unless we only play big 4km desert maps with no possibilites of CQB firefights.

viirusiiseli wrote:100p is way too much. Infantry combat has turned into Call of Duty. 80 would be doable.

Cossack112 wrote:Sorry guys, its hardcoded. Still no solution for this found. And we cant have SL's only.