Project Reality Forums

I was thinking maybe i could use my second pc for gaming too.Which one would show more fps in gaming, the integrated Intel HD 4000 or the old 9400 GT ?


The Cpu is the G3220 @ 3.00 Ghz with 4gb RAM at 1600 Mhz

The G3220 does not have the Intel HD 4000.
It has this:

Graphics Specifications
Processor Graphics ‡ Intel? HD Graphics
Graphics Base Frequency 350 MHz
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency 1.1 GHz
Intel? Quick Sync Video No
Intel? Clear Video HD Technology Yes
# of Displays Supported ‡ 3

ARK | Intel? Pentium? Processor G3220 (3M Cache, 3.00 GHz)

I really doubt it will run vanilla BF2, let alone PR.

You can try overclocking the 9400 GT though (slowly), but at your own risk! Use MSI Afterburner (best program) and watch the temperature in Overlay.

9400 gt overclocking - Graphics Cards - Overclocking

But you will get ~ 5 fps more only (according to a forum)...

So you better buy a GTS 450, GTX 460, GTX 560 Ti or GTX 650 Ti (Boost) (Not thaaat expensive)

Honestly, the Geforce would get barely ~5 FPS more then the INTEL HD.

You would be better off getting a Gfx card that is decent and can run PR.

I would recommend the GTS 450, my bro's PC has one, iit's very nice IMO.

But isn't GTX 460, GTX 560 Ti and GTX 650 Ti (Boost) all same price range and more powerful than GTS 450 ??

Guys???

Yes it it.

For future reference; PassMark Software - Video Card Benchmarks - High End Video Cards

And how did you get an Intel HD 4000 with an AMD processor lol?



I'm running 30 to 70 fps with a i7 4770 on all high (no AA) on all maps.

Integrated graphics are fine for PR.