Project Reality Forums

I actually don't know if this has been discussed before, but it always wondered me...

Most of the AA vehicles in the game are able to be operated by a single player. Is this intentionally or just an oversight? Since most servers enforce a no-solo assets rule, i'm always a bit hesitant to take an AA vehicle into the field on my own.

It is intentional. Servers decide on their own whether that rule is enforced for AA vehicles. Personally the only server I ever knew that enforced that rule was TG.

It goes back to the days of 64 player severs. Back then on larger maps it was difficult to field players for every asset and have infantry.

That being said it has always worked best with two players.

AAVs like Tunguska is awesome with 2 men. Others? no... sometimes, it's just a waste of man power.

Jolly wrote:AAVs like Tunguska is awesome with 2 men. Others? no... sometimes, it's just a waste of man power.

I think it's almost dumb to one man an Tunguska.

It's armored.
Slower.
Just a valuable asset.
Plus, only one spawns.


Meanwhile like the US and USMC Avengers, MTLB AA, GB AA (Don't know what it's called) are definently (I think) made for solo operating.

It's very agile. But, I think having a gunner is much more neccessary cause it takes a little bit for the gun to 'heat' up.

Using an ADV with 2 crew members instead of 1 is still better regardless of vehicle.