Project Reality Forums

Old Beta thread:
https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f253-m ... dback.html

Post feedback here.

For now we will monitor the overall round stats over the next month, as players need to get used to the environment and develop tactics. Then we see how big the balancing issues really are and will make needed adjustments.


PS: We are aware that there are vehicle life time issues when unused on the AAS 128layer, which couldn't be fixed anymore during the release progress for the version 1.1.4.0.

Daniel wrote:Vehicle T-72 tank does not respawn anymore. Should be fixed ASAP in INS gamemode. thx.

Its intentional, same with the bmp and mi8

No, BMP-2 seems to respawn after 20 minutes, same as BTR-60. (I checked file).

I quote Insurgency file, BMP-2 part:

"ObjectTemplate.modifiedByUser "jeff"
ObjectTemplate.minSpawnDelay 1200
ObjectTemplate.maxSpawnDelay 1200"

Yes and the tank is not. It's intentional.

And I think rabbit meant the BMP2M on AAS16.

MEC gets soooo much armor in AAS it feels like. My squad was getting decimated. This map seems to have a lot of potential for INF combat but I only saw two guys. Saw like 5 pieces of armor though. Well made map though.

Chefmoto1 wrote:MEC gets soooo much armor in AAS it feels like. My squad was getting decimated. This map seems to have a lot of potential for INF combat but I only saw two guys. Saw like 5 pieces of armor though. Well made map though.

I love this map, Makes PR more realistic then before,

This map seems... crashy. We had like four CTDs in the span of 15 like minutes.

Crash to desktop? Who is we?

Well I crashed, cpt.capper did too, and EpicPoonHound crashed twice, so just me and a couple buddies. This all happened withing the span of about 15 minutes. I dont know if its the map or the update but I played sbeneh earlier and we didnt have any problems.

I love the map, one suggestion I have is to perhaps limit the amount of breachable doors and gates and have some of them be open by default. There isn't always a breacher nearby and the lack of wooden crates or other objects that can be jumped on, made it so that I spent quite a lot of time running around compounds trying to find a way in.

Other than that, I absolutely love it. As an inf lover, this urban combat really does it for me, thanks for making this beautiful new addition to PR.

(wrong thread)

brezmans wrote:I love the map, one suggestion I have is to perhaps limit the amount of breachable doors and gates and have some of them be open by default. There isn't always a breacher nearby and the lack of wooden crates or other objects that can be jumped on, made it so that I spent quite a lot of time running around compounds trying to find a way in.

Other than that, I absolutely love it. As an inf lover, this urban combat really does it for me, thanks for making this beautiful new addition to PR.

Our squad used a breacher with a rope for that

Found some floating stuff, other than that the map seems great. Maybe add 1 SPG to LRG layout, 2 tanks have too much to deal with.

[R-DEV]K4on wrote:Our squad used a breacher with a rope for that

Obviously, k4on, which is also what I wrote. However, there's not always a breacher available and the amount of locked gates seems much higher than on other, similar maps.

more to blow, which is good

Got ambushed by techi's in my mi17.. I got pissed off but at the same time it was so realistic. The the ambushes etc. Love the map. A lot of rooftops to ambush people etc... I really wish we could of have the Syrian Army implemented though. Can't wait for them

Wheres_my_chili wrote:This map seems... crashy. We had like four CTDs in the span of 15 like minutes.

Need a bit more info. Can you think of anything that was a occurrence with the crashes? Map layer, location in the map, faction, kit, vehicle, on spawn or running around etc.

brezmans wrote:I love the map, one suggestion I have is to perhaps limit the amount of breachable doors and gates and have some of them be open by default. There isn't always a breacher nearby and the lack of wooden crates or other objects that can be jumped on, made it so that I spent quite a lot of time running around compounds trying to find a way in.

Other than that, I absolutely love it. As an inf lover, this urban combat really does it for me, thanks for making this beautiful new addition to PR.

IIrc, there should be several paths through each block, so part of it will just be learning where they are. However I will go back through it and make sure they have plenty of paths through them.

I love infantry too, its all I play, at the end of ins most of our vehicles were gone so it turned into a massive inf attack against fsa and their techies.

Prevtzer wrote:Found some floating stuff, other than that the map seems great. Maybe add 1 SPG to LRG layout, 2 tanks have too much to deal with.

Thanks, will adjust the terrain for those. Looks like you have the beastly m16, that thing put fear into our mec squad for a whole round. We actively tried to avoid it.

This map is honestly fantastic... I've had a thoroughly good time playing as both sides, and now that the 1-hit-kill bug is fixed, inf gameplay is a lot more forgiving (and less frustrating)

In my opinion, the AAS version, especially Standard seems biased in favour of the Syrian Rebels. Both rounds I've played, MEC lost by 100+ tickets

Causes:
Rebels have better weapons for CQB (M16 especially)
Ticket bleed until 3rd flag for MEC
2 tanks for Rebels on STD (This makes no sense to me, imo the MEC should have more armour in any case)

Solutions:
Have the MEC ticket bleed flag as Gas Station
Give the Rebels more FALs and SKS', move M16 to Spotter kit
Add 1 Mi-8 Hip to MEC on STD & LRG (MEC seem to be incredibly lacking in mobility on this map)
Replace one Rebel tank on STD with Spandrel, give MEC and additional BMP

There's also a bug with the MI-24 on Large, it tells the gunner they are unable to operate that vehicle position even if they have a pilot kit.

Cheers for the input.

For now we will monitor the overall round stats over the next month, as players need to get used to the environment and develop tactics. Then we see how big the balancing issues really are and will make needed adjustments.