RAWSwampFox wrote:
Have you noticed that some people are extremely "in your face" about the technical terms of items in the game? Example, APC spotted and someone says, NO, that is an IFV, etc.
it's actually important though, if the opponent has BTR80s and BMP-3s then whether it's one or the other makes tank maneuvering very different.
Criteria for APC:
- Armoured (must be able to stand 1 LAT in the front arc without exploding, or take zero damage from small arms.)
- Carry personnel (seats that do not require crewman)
- Gun less than 20mm in diameter
Examples: BTR-60 14.5, Stryker .50, AAVP, M113
Criteria for IFV
- Armoured
- Carry personnel
- Gun larger than 20mm, and less than 40mm
BMP-2, MTLB 30mm, Bradley, Warrior, Puma, LAV-25
Criteria for Tank
- Armoured
- Gun larger than 40mm
- That's it, it can be wheeled, it can carry troops, whatever
Neither APC, Tank or IFV: BRDM, Scimitar, Panther CLV
Generally these are "scout vehicles". They perform recon, fire support and interdiction.
Not only are these kinds of things important for telling friendlies quickly and accurate what they're facing, but their roles are different. People seem to think that IFV crews that use their vehicle as an offensive interdiction or fire support assets are using it unrealistically, which is not true. What's the point of a giant cannon and missile battery if you're a taxi

Yeah they're great when integrated with infantry squads, some of the greatest success I've had in the game are in these squads, but still
Also these things are important for asset claiming. I've been accused of asset stealing for taking a Scimitar when an APC squad exists. How does it follow that a squad named armoured personnel carrier holds a vehicle that cannot carry personnel.