The game is change a lot . but its still FPS .
so most maps are valid .
90% of the maps are valid. Obviously some should be taken out, and some should be back in... that's worthy another discussion.
lot of maps that now availebale is just walking simulator . and just not fun to play on them .
Well, I suggest playing on a different server than. Walking Simulator??
for example - Yamala this map just flat ground with trees nothing intresting on here everthing green .
It's interesting if you play on a full server that has a good team(s). And coordinating very well. I think it's one of the BEST flanking maps in the game. Infantry can easily sneak around and take an entire squad out. It's interesting when you get ambushed out of no where.
Kokan - evertything grey no intresting places or compands . just run across the field simulator .
What do you consider interesting? I think it's interesting that they were able to put AA cannons on roof's of buildings. I have yet to truly run across a field like how your describing. It's no mans land.
lot of old maps got some sort of story , a feel that you in some kind of senario . like that map when u parashute to MEC airfield .
All maps have a story to them. There's always the one 'key' objective... Like on Jabal... who ever holds Dam the longest, pretty much will win the game.
or Even 7 Gates where the senario is very clear and intresting .
Just like a lot of other maps. I remember playing 7 gates, and it was a blast indeed!
most of the maps that we have now are too balanced and soulless
Your complaining about too balanced maps? ?????? That's what makes a round very fun. Balanced Gameplay. It's better to win in a close battle than a huge steamroll.
IMO, there is WAY too many underplayed maps that offer great gameplay when you have 2 teams.