Where i get the info from that it is an intended feature?
Literally just look at the quote in my post from the developer saying so, seriously do you guys even actually care to read other posts thoroughly instead of just skimming over them and then getting riled up?
Maybe my posts would actually make sense to you if you tried to understand what i wrote exactly.
The jets don't just get out of control for no reason, if they do it is because you strained them too much.
After i started paying attention to fly more carefully and stay withing the jets limits this never happens to me anymore. It mostly happens if you do some weird shit like pulling up full force and then rolling very hard, try to be more gentle and it should be fine.
That's the beauty of this feature, instead of just turning full force all the time and the jet with the better turn rate wins like before, now winning dogfights is more about technique and knowing how to apply the right amount of thrust and pitch, knowing the jets limits instead of just using brute maximum input all the time.
Of course turn rates are still important in dogfights, but emphasis is shifted much more towards variation and skills now instead of simple turnfights like before.
In real life you have a sophisticated computer system which warns you when you are approaching stall conditions.
IRL we also have TADS for the pilots with full stabalization, bomb sights with FCS that calculates almost the exact impact and radar that allows us to spot enemy jets way past VD. So what's your point?
Should we for example remove unguided bombs just because it is way harder to hit stuff with them because we don't have the bomb computer calculating the impact spot for us?
Jut because it is harder to avoid stalls because it is not possible to have a computer warn us doesn't mean we should remove stalls, same logic.
you should watch some DCS world video's on how Really Jet works IRL...
I play DCS, but thanks anyway.
say something that make other's say "you're right and i agree with you"...
That is such a shitty attitude and defeats the whole purpose of a forum and discussion.
Let's just all go with the mainstream and don't brush anyone the wrong way, shall we? Because otherwise we might actually end up having a real discussion with different viewpoints and become exposed to different ideas.