Project Reality Forums

1.Sorry for my English
2.I cant understand how i need shoot on scope,because my scope is absolutely stable and after a shot I see how my bullet flies away who knows where and not where my scope was. I recently found out that on a sniper rifle you need to wait 4 seconds before shooting and on a standard m4 you need to wait one or two and this it’s very, very bad because it’s not immersive. It would be nice if it were replaced simply by swinging as when walking with aiming and the bullet flew exactly on the sight as far as I know it was entered into Squad a long time ago and it was good to tighten the shooting in PR to the same level.

On bottom of the screen you have two small dots. This indicate your accuracy. When they are separate your bullets will fly everywhere, when connects bullets will hit exactly where you are aiming. Weapons with bipod usually takes more time to get full accuracy but when you shoot full auto you won't loose that accuracy. Also it is immersive if you think about it as breath control etc.

very, very bad because it’s not immersive

Okay. I recommend Squad.

Yes, the fact that I can’t shoot accurately right away is good and Imersion, it’s just that the mechanics incorrectly implemented by the bullet that you fired after waiting flies exactly where you aim and the fired bullet immediately after aiming flies away from the barrel and all this time the barrel is stable and does not twitch and it looks like they gave you a broken inaccurate weapon

In almost every FPS game, twitch-aiming is a huge factor of skill. BF2 is different and unique. Its a game that barely depends on aim. If you want to just aim, play the other 3 billion FPS games out there that depend on it.

If you don't see the implications of lowering the impact of aim, this isn't a game for you. This is an important feature that will never be changed.

Anch wrote:Squad a long time ago and it was good to tighten the shooting in PR to the same level.

You could just play Squad instead if its shooting mechanics are more to your liking, you know?

I said that I like the fact that the game gives realistic aiming mechanics,that after aiming you need time to hold your breath and scope stops twitching,but it infuriates me that the developers just create a protective dome around the enemy and bullets fly past him why instead, you can’t make the scope twitch, as when walking and with waiting time it reduces the amplitude of wiggle

1. Because that's what DICE decided in 2004.
2. Even if we had a choice, I'd personally still keep deviation. There are enough games doing the other and none of them play like PR.

Oh hell, I see how the Refractor engine works, and there is no way to fix it. Battlefield 2 was probably made in an incredible hurry.

Anch wrote:Oh hell, I see how the Refractor engine works, and there is no way to fix it. Battlefield 2 was probably made in an incredible hurry.

It was just after the turn of the century, and while it wasn't ground breaking in any serious sense, Battlefield 2 was still one of the best FPS military games, yet still had serious multiplayer balance issues and tons of common simple FPS shooter exploits that were a thing back in the old like Dolphin Diving, Bunny Sniping, and others... PR leveled the playing field there as best as possible within the engine limitations, and here we are today counting Mississippi's before firing.

I think plenty of people enjoy the fact that someone who plays 12 hours a day with a precision DPI mouse that they are very well trained on cannot simply "twitch shot-kill" some other player who is attempting to take a proper defensive position to aim and return fire. Nearly like a mil-sim, players need to pay attention to stance/focus and take the time to aim - since it's a game, learning THAT system instead of "twitch mouse accuracy" is the niche that PR does well.

This game needs to change the engine and the ballistics, otherwise the new players will not appear and the old ones will go away in this game everything is fine I love to ride the Apc and Tank and apply the strategy against the enemy but everything collapses when you pick up small arms in your hands until today I put up with the ballistics of this game, but today when I was shot by a dude who was moving at that time and I can’t understand this ballistics, it is taken from an arcade game and as redone for complexity as possible, which makes it bad and unrealistic

Are you real?

Well, he is right! That why we have Squad and PS.

why game not like call of dooty please make game like call of dooty

An irreplaceable detail PR is an angry developer who all the time says that everyone wants Call of Duty but the problem is that when I talk about good balistics I talk about it https://www.realitymod.com/forum/showth ... hlight=Hit

Deviation has nothing to do with ballistics

xD


Peidei e sai correndo, pau no cu de quem ta lendo. (dont translate this on google, it will not translate properly!

just learn the game men
real easy just learn

Guys I'm playing chess but it doesn't have guns with perfect accuracy??? Why is chess so bad not immersion pls fix???

This thread has gone its course it seems.