Project Reality Forums

i really hope it stays

Probably for another week or so.

Really hope we get rid of flat earth, the map feels too troll for PR standards no lie. I honestly wish we kept Icebound instead, what are the odds of bringing it back? It was one of the best maps in the seasonal pack

AlonTavor wrote:Probably for another week or so.

No way It needs to stay!

I only hate that no one is running it to be able to play, should be in the rotations.

Nothing wrong with having a weird map like this in PR, its fun.

Coalz101 wrote:Really hope we get rid of flat earth,

Honestly, what difference does it make that it is in the map list? Just a fun option.

AlonTavor wrote:Probably for another week or so.

We need a joke map from time to time.. Can we just keep it forever? If players suggest it then players suggest it. We can mess with new players and say "flat earth" in the vote and they can have the same memed out amazement we did on April fools when we all vote for it, it will keep them around longer. I like the change in terrain for every continent we go on, it changes the tactics.

From 1 man per tree/bush in jungle or American woodlands to using a wide spread formation to counter the moons lasers over desert, snowy tundra or urban areas requiring tactic change to scan high/low/far/close pre-fire to back enemy off etc. All we need is logi trucks, deployable bridge spots all over, so we can make the long bridge like river Qwai map. Super Fobs would be needed to pull security to build and cross these bridges.

WingWalker wrote:No way It needs to stay!



Nothing wrong with having a weird map like this in PR, its fun.



Honestly, what difference does it make that it is in the map list? Just a fun option.

Jesus please take it off for that exact reason, we already play enough WW2/INS to make one person not want to play, we dont need more random maps to be requested that are not on par with the gameplay quality that PR is known for.

Still no reason to trash a map with all that work in it, that people on here see as fun.

Brotherscompany wrote:we already play enough WW2/INS to make one person not want to play

So you hate WW2 and INS, and now you think 1 map added to the map list will ruin your world? Your world where you basically hate most of PR?

How do you hate WW2? Its just a different set of kits.

First of all sorry this will get a bit off topic and its a bit of a rant on my side.

WingWalker wrote:Still no reason to trash a map with all that work in it, that people on here see as fun.

I am not? In the same way the Winter maps were removed this one should follow the same path, a limited time one. The difference between being fun and good are quite different and there is a standard to gameplay, why do you think the old PR maps are still not around or some maps are not all that played?

WingWalker wrote:So you hate WW2 and INS, and now you think 1 map added to the map list will ruin your world?

Oh yes totally it would be a further detriment to playing the game because I know it would be a recurrent map being asked to be played, unfortunately I have less than I used to have when I was a bit younger so I value it a lot more (Im sure a lot of people can relate). Its not all that great having a good time or playing some poor maps in the hopes for the next one to be a good one only to have something random being set.

WingWalker wrote:Your world where you basically hate most of PR? How do you hate WW2? Its just a different set of kits.

Well yeah, I (and many other players that I have spoken to recently) basically dislike the current PR since the maps and game modes want to play had shift in the last months from what it used to be norm for years.
Just for some background Im not anywhere close to a Asset whore, I only did assets less than 10 times in PR, Im a pure casual/semi-serious INF player that likes some variation and used to enjoy WW2 and INS and argued with peers/older players that it could be fun just wanting to deny it, I used to get really excited to play those 2 game modes. They were played once in a while as a escape from the Meta and something different, then I realized they had some limitations and offered lower gameplay quality so I started to enjoy them less, but enjoying for what they were.
Unfortunately for some reason now a days people want to keep playing those kind of maps so yeah no much fun in playing under those conditions, look at the names of older players and notice what happens when those maps are set (after all this time I finally understood them).

Just to keep it short since Im getting off topic and just ranting at this point (and there is a thread why WW2 isnt fun)
WW2 either play infinite human wave map, or play the same laggy avarage maps with not that much variation in the layouts and ways you can play them differently.
INS you are handicapped and have less tactical options and slightly turns in TDM and just a lot more dead time if you are to sit in one place.
Why would I prefer playing this over AAS with a wider variety of maps, not that many handicaps and more tactical options where I know if I mess up the enemy will punish me instead of infinite try and repeat, not going to pretend to enjoy whats becoming the norm without making some noise.

This map is genius, lot of small detail from real world.

PS : you can add a tunnel between mexico and US border

WingWalker wrote: Your world where you basically hate most of PR?

Brotherscompany wrote:basically dislike the current PR

That is all you needed to say... You hate PR.

It's not this specific map we are talking about, its you.

Also, you are being really, really, really over dramatic.

WingWalker wrote:That is all you needed to say... You hate PR.

It's not this specific map we are talking about, its you.

Also, you are being really, really, really over dramatic.

Aight Dr. Phill

Love this troll - all the conspiracy stuff - funny as hell! Well done, devs! Not that they have any consensus on any particular "fact" other than "science bad, me smort", but quite a number of flat earth idiots don't believe that Australia exists, I could almost hear the whiny protests now... "that's not our map!" (as if they truly have one)

qs-racer wrote:This map is genius, lot of small detail from real world.

PS : you can add a tunnel between mexico and US border

Is that so much of a conspiracy theory? There literally are tunnels... not sure if new ones pop up as fast as they find others, but there are so many places where towns on either side have grown close to the border, allowing smugglers or w/e to pass underground. Like, it's a proper fact, not a wild idea only believed by some, right?

AlonTavor wrote:Probably for another week or so.

Its a great test map to mess around with, like how a fast rope was added to the moon.

Grump/Gump.45 wrote:Its a great test map to mess around with, like how a fast rope was added to the moon.

Make a copy of it, its going out soon

You bring it back today. Right now buster. Its only 1 hour away EST from April Fools. Our player numbers are dropping from the 500s.

Partially because I have not been playing, so that means no other SL have been doing 1 man per tree, camouflage the squad, foxhole super FOB asset line, no getting up in trees, no logistics repairs, no playing dead. To these new guys its just another FPS

Its almost like, aside from showing its potential as an FPS based on realism, we need to show what potential sets it apart from all other FPS when it comes to teamwork. The playing dead, getting up in trees, armor brigade tactics and such. You can't actually get 1 man per tree in Hell Let Loose or any of these other games because nobody uses teamwork there due to Call Of Duty.

Grump/Gump.45 wrote:You bring it back today. Right now buster. Its only 1 hour away EST from April Fools. Our player numbers are dropping from the 500s.

Partially because I have not been playing, so that means no other SL have been doing 1 man per tree, camouflage the squad, foxhole super FOB asset line, no getting up in trees, no logistics repairs, no playing dead. To these new guys its just another FPS

Its almost like, aside from showing its potential as an FPS based on realism, we need to show what potential sets it apart from all other FPS when it comes to teamwork. The playing dead, getting up in trees, armor brigade tactics and such. You can't actually get 1 man per tree in Hell Let Loose or any of these other games because nobody uses teamwork there due to Call Of Duty.

good points grump it's just the new players not knowing how pr is meant to be played teamwork and communication go a long way from the commander, sl to player level some don't even have mics but they type and listen and understand the same as regular players in pr