People will not all want to have this gun and i do think not all would because its magazine is very limited and then your only other choice would be our sidearm which is useless against any other normally.CobraPhantom wrote:Just as long as everybody isnt running around with one, I guess its a good addition...never been much of a sniper fan tho
try killing an APC, hummer or even doing damage to tanks with this and your in the right area... (the 50 caliber rifles can pentrate through brick walls and tank barriers and even displace sandbag walls (anti material rifle/aniti light armor rifle - they dident make this so you could make a mess off peoples heads) so this takes you a step above that again. ) is we need some seriously better scopes X16 or min of X8 is required for any kind of realismn. Yea one off them but just browsing the net i found the 'elephant gun' as its nicknamed.[R-DEV wrote:Djuice]wow that gotta be one of the most pwerful handheld weapons ever!
look at this link and after you looked at the gun go down and look at the ammo!! 
you might want to see this... with a 50pound portable sniper rifle accurate at 2000 metres - same as the 109 and 107 allthough all all capable of far greater kill distances thats the reliable range i supose.lol, wow,you miss and still get a killI love the M109, I recall reading once that the M109 Anti-Material Sniper Rifle is so powerful, that even if the round passes by a human with-in 5ft or so, the energy it disperses is so much that the human will die do to a sudden increase in energy/pressure or something like that, but yes, this would make a great addition to PR.
Not good when a lot of civillians around then. Hah. I'm sure if thats the case the Geneva Convention may not allow it.Tactical Advantage wrote:I love the M109, I recall reading once that the M109 Anti-Material Sniper Rifle is so powerful, that even if the round passes by a human with-in 5ft or so, the energy it disperses is so much that the human will die do to a sudden increase in energy/pressure or something like that, but yes, this would make a great addition to PR.
The geneva convention does allow it. and no such **** that anti material rifles cannot be used against human targets.Medicoris wrote:Not good when a lot of civillians around then. Hah. I'm sure if thats the case the Geneva Convention may not allow it.Tactical Advantage wrote:I love the M109, I recall reading once that the M109 Anti-Material Sniper Rifle is so powerful, that even if the round passes by a human with-in 5ft or so, the energy it disperses is so much that the human will die do to a sudden increase in energy/pressure or something like that, but yes, this would make a great addition to PR.
Nonetheless, this weapon would be best implemented if it was a kit you could pick up at your main base. This way it won't become so overused.
The M107/USMC M82A3 will be included. The XM109 it not yet been adopted and there are only 6-10 examples in field evaluation, depending on the source. As for what this mod had better or better not include, please stow the attitude.TerribleOne wrote:A must though if this or the M107 are included (which they better be
Bincoulars are also a must for spotting purposes X20.
If possible these telescopic devices should be able to flick through all or at least a few of the ranges.
TerribleOne wrote:eh. yea we need one off those to take out light armor - if you dont agree look in the link and reconsider
this is the gun they use when 50cal just isent enough so they use a 25mm round
http://media.popularmechanics.com/image ... 109-lg.jpg
A canadian sniper scored the furthest confirmed kill with a 107-(2400metres)- allthough hatchcock got a confirmed kill at around 2500 metres in vietnam.[R-DEV wrote:Eddie Baker]The M107/USMC M82A3 will be included. The XM109 it not yet been adopted and there are only 6-10 examples in field evaluation, depending on the source. As for what this mod had better or better not include, please stow the attitude.TerribleOne wrote:A must though if this or the M107 are included (which they better be
Bincoulars are also a must for spotting purposes X20.
If possible these telescopic devices should be able to flick through all or at least a few of the ranges.
The most common US military issue binoculars are x7 magnification and have a reticle designed to aid in forward observation. Not sure about more powerful ones; those who want them might have to buy their own. The US does have an issue x20 spotting telescope, though, the M49.
Variable optics have been experimented with and will work, but not every weapon is issued with them. The current issue day telescope for the M107 is a variable optic with a x4.5 to 14 magnification range. As for magnification power, the lowest you might see for a military sniper rifle (rather than a designated marksman rifle) is x6. The L115A1 (AWM .338 Lapua) is issued with a x6 telescopic sight to rifle platoons in UK rapid deployment units (like the Parachute Regiment and Royal Marine Commandos). The sniper teams within their recce units and UK special operations forces may employ more powerful optics, though, like the new one for the L96A1 (x3 to 12).
". There was none it was a meaningles comment showing how important this gun is imo. If you took it the wrong way please reconsider your comment and take it how it was meant.
