Project Reality Forums

This is one of my concerns about PR, please fix those .50 cal machine guns on Humvees, etc. Because is it just me or are those thing like a no recoil, dead on accurate full-auto sniper rifle, I mean I've sat in a Humvee and literally pecked guys of at like 200m on full-auto, just move the cross hairs over your target while holding down the trigger and the guy just drops, not that it isnt fun to light up the enemy at 200m, but it seems unrealistic, so please fix the physics of the .50 cal Machine Gun. More recoil, and harder to control while firing full-auto.

hahah, the M2 owns 1km effective range

In the vietnam war, they put scopes on them and used them as snipers.

yea i agree i dont see any real reason to changem

You guys want a big scope on an M2HB here you go :

http://www.dod.gov/photos/Oct2004/04100 ... 7B-001.jpg

That's indeed a big scope...

Nice find.

indeed a big scope... night vision?

super62 has a good point, having .50 cals with scopes is where .50 cal snipers really befan.

id liek ot seee iron sites on teh .50 or im fine with just no crosshairs

50 cal needs more screen shakiness

normal firing= no sights, have to use tracers to aim, head is exposed more
alternate firing (right click or change weapon mode or somthing) = sights, but way more shakines, but head is far less exposed

thats true, its a stationary gun, its obviously not the smooth firing bf2 makes it out to be but you do have a sturdy platform.

I think could use more recoil, but thats about it

just imagine the tone of my adjectives being different, and you know im right... yay for non absolute terms!