Project Reality Forums

What is the nature of the relationship between BlackSand Studio, US Intervention and Project Reality? How much content sharing is going on between PR & USI? Would it be possible for PR to use USI's M1? I really think the Abrams needs another MG.

How many does it have IRL? Two isn't it?

Yes, 2. M1A2 TUSK! DAMNIT!

We're currently using the F-16C, A-10, BRDM-2, support jeep, TOW jeep, SU-25, UAZ, Avenger (AA "Humvee"). These are all from USI.

Edit: Yes, the real life M1A2 SEP has 3 MG's:
1 for the loader: A 7.62mm M240C on a skate mount.
1 for the gunner: A co-axial 7.62mm M240C.
1 for the commander: A .50 cal M2 MG on a flex mount.

And why not the closed HWMMV? And don't dare to lock this before I get my answer...

Close the HMMWV boot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It's plain stupid to sit in a HMMWV like that in battle!!!

ME AGREEEEES!

ReadMenace wrote:What is the nature of the relationship between BlackSand Studio, US Intervention and Project Reality? How much content sharing is going on between PR & USI? Would it be possible for PR to use USI's M1? I really think the Abrams needs another MG.

it's not worth the effort.
Who is loading the main gun if the loader is arsing about with the M240? It's not realistic to allow that option without creating a loader. And imo there are already too many positions in the tank - a commander giving orders to the 'driver' and a gunner giving orders to the 'loader' would have been sufficient.

im not trying to offend the USI develovers , but the USI's vehicles have very low policount , like the rapir truck of PLA/MEC/USMC , or the insurgens APC . I would love to see those vehicles remodeled

The HUMVEE MOVEMENT GROWS! DEV watch out, for if not, a players revolution will take place with the storming of the AlBasara Palace!!!!! followed by a film in which more players die acting it out - YOU have been WARNED!