Chinook
Posted: 2005-08-20 21:43
IS it possible the reality team can add a chinook to battlefield 2? I think it would be a lot better transporting wise, and the blackhawk would be a gunship
The CH-46 is the Sea Knight, aka "Frog." It is still used by the Marines and is supposed to be replaced by the MV-22; the Navy is phasing them out with the C/MH-60S "Knighthawk." We do not wish to include the Sea Knight in game, since the H-53 series can be modeled an provide us with a base for the USAF MH-53 Pave Low as well as the USMC CH-53D/E Sea Stallion/Super Stallion. Also, the horror stories we've heard about the Frog from various people have convinced us that if we should model it and implement it in game, a curse would befall all of our firstborn children.Beckwith wrote:will it be the CH-46 or the Marine variant? im not sure what the name of it is its a mini-me version that the marines use
Not for long. Its in the final stages of Op-eval, if it makes it through this, its all up to the pentagon to put it into action.BrokenArrow wrote:i would love to see the MV-22... sadly its still going through its paces in testing.
Its because the original group working on it skipped a lot of test flights to try and meet funding renewals. Because they skipped all the test flights, whenever they tried to show it off, something went wrong that could have been fixed. Since the last accident (which killed 19 people) the team working on the MV-22 changed and began more thoroughly testing the plane. Now they're in op-eval (this is the second time its been in op-eval, first was with the other R&D team) and unless another problem comes up, it will most likely be put into use. They really are amazing planes, they can carry the same load as the seaknight, but fly twice as far, refuel in air, and fly much faster.BlakeJr wrote:You mean to tell me that the MV-22 has been tested for, what, 17 years???
What's been the delay?
First flight of an Osprey was sometime in 1988 and since tilt rotor aircraft has been in the making since the 1950:s you would think that they had become operational sometime in the late 1990:s at the latest...
Then again, stranger things have happened.![]()
Didn't know that, obviously.Pak wrote:Its because the original group working on it skipped a lot of test flights to try and meet funding renewals. Because they skipped all the test flights, whenever they tried to show it off, something went wrong that could have been fixed. Since the last accident (which killed 19 people) the team working on the MV-22 changed and began more thoroughly testing the plane. Now they're in op-eval (this is the second time its been in op-eval, first was with the other R&D team) and unless another problem comes up, it will most likely be put into use. They really are amazing planes, they can carry the same load as the seaknight, but fly twice as far, refuel in air, and fly much faster.BlakeJr wrote:You mean to tell me that the MV-22 has been tested for, what, 17 years???
What's been the delay?
First flight of an Osprey was sometime in 1988 and since tilt rotor aircraft has been in the making since the 1950:s you would think that they had become operational sometime in the late 1990:s at the latest...
Then again, stranger things have happened.![]()