Page 1 of 4

Spec Ops v0.6?

Posted: 2007-04-04 14:16
by zizler
Will SF soldier be altered in this future release? I'm just curious because I tried to find any info it but couldn't find any. Because I hope the spec ops gets better equipment for behind enemy lines kinda stuff.

Posted: 2007-04-04 14:19
by G.Drew

Posted: 2007-04-04 14:33
by duckhunt
wow those poll results are pracically even lol

Posted: 2007-04-04 14:39
by Gaz
As it stands currently, you can decipher it as this:

Get rid of it - 23.17%

Make it into a limited or more 'specialist' kit - 63.41%

Leave it alone - 13.41%

Posted: 2007-04-04 15:39
by eggman
It's pretty much left alone, tho not really because the other classes and class system is changing around it. It's the vanilla lone wolf n00b class :p

Posted: 2007-04-04 16:03
by zizler
My main class is spec ops. I usually go behind enemy lines and then destroy rp's, assets bridges. I'm definitely no n00b. Sometimes lone wolf because I can't use a whole squad when I'm sneaking up to RP's. It's a winning tactic. The only times I won on hills of hamyong is because I destroyed every single RP on the map, including the ones in the back where everyone can spawn. I just hoped maybe spec ops could get more of a purpose besides doing that and being an infantry pawn class.

Posted: 2007-04-04 16:51
by Master Shake
Give them these.... http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/20 ... orces.html


See the article link above first-- Vid of something similar-- http://www.metacafe.com/watch/468993/jetman/

Posted: 2007-04-04 17:03
by VipersGhost
WOW! Those wing insertions would be AWESOME! We should def try and get those in the game!

Posted: 2007-04-04 17:21
by Wasteland
Are you serious dude? He was joking. LOL. It's PReality, not PFantasy.

But seriously, that first link didn't work. Second one was cool. I wish I knew how he was controlling it. Just manipulating his body, or with flaps on the wing or something.

EDIT: OK, got the link working.

Posted: 2007-04-04 19:35
by vanity
zizler wrote:My main class is spec ops. I usually go behind enemy lines and then destroy rp's, assets bridges. I'm definitely no n00b. Sometimes lone wolf because I can't use a whole squad when I'm sneaking up to RP's. It's a winning tactic. The only times I won on hills of hamyong is because I destroyed every single RP on the map, including the ones in the back where everyone can spawn. I just hoped maybe spec ops could get more of a purpose besides doing that and being an infantry pawn class.
The SF only carries 2 SLAMS, so where are you reloading to continue your backline bonanza?

Posted: 2007-04-04 19:45
by BLind
exactly. the only people who take spec ops are those who want to spray with the m4. If you want to blow stuff up and cuase havoc behnd enemy lines then engineer is far more effiecient, and any class can be stealthy, theres really no excuse. Thats why if any1 dares take spec ops in one my squads they fined themselves kicked instantly.

Posted: 2007-04-04 19:46
by Nickbond592
ememy jeeps, apc, enemy ammobags, ammodump, rifleman buddy ,supply crate

seek and thus you shal findeth

Posted: 2007-04-04 19:49
by vanity
If people want the m4, that's fine by me. I think it's a pea-shooter and the lack of armor puts them at a serious disadvantage. They won't survive against the G3 or AK in any engagement. But I honestly do question this "behind the lines operative" spiel we get every so often. Who's resupplying them after every destroyed asset?

*NVM - "ememy jeeps, apc, enemy ammobags, ammodump, rifleman buddy ,supply crate"

Posted: 2007-04-04 20:05
by {GD}Snake13
'[R-CON wrote:BLind']exactly. the only people who take spec ops are those who want to spray with the m4. If you want to blow stuff up and cuase havoc behnd enemy lines then engineer is far more effiecient, and any class can be stealthy, theres really no excuse. Thats why if any1 dares take spec ops in one my squads they fined themselves kicked instantly.
Thats rather foolish, I take specops sometimes because I find I can get head shot people very effectively with the red dot, and the auto helps in close quarters. Do you kick people with the AT kit because they just want to kill vehicles?

Posted: 2007-04-04 20:11
by gazzthompson
i use spec ops on basrah to go behind enery lines and blow stuff up, i kept a tally of it all :P ...

spawn cars destroyed : 14
Trucks/sucide cars destroyed : 4
AAA destroyed : 3
ammo dumps : 2
Bikes:3
Tank(took a fair few goes):1

and only killed like 2 ppl , only shot when needed to.

Posted: 2007-04-04 20:17
by zeroburrito
vanity wrote:If people want the m4, that's fine by me. I think it's a pea-shooter and the lack of armor puts them at a serious disadvantage. They won't survive against the G3 or AK in any engagement. But I honestly do question this "behind the lines operative" spiel we get every so often. Who's resupplying them after every destroyed asset?

*NVM - "ememy jeeps, apc, enemy ammobags, ammodump, rifleman buddy ,supply crate"
body armor and no body armor is the same against an ak or g3. its better to have no armor versing the insurgents and mec.

Posted: 2007-04-04 20:18
by vanity
O RLY? I didnt know that.

Posted: 2007-04-04 20:19
by zeroburrito
yea it sucks..i hate facing the G3..USMC has a huge disadvantage in soldier equipment(erased on basrah from all their assets). but the other maps with no airpower both teams being equal in skill, mec wins every time.

Posted: 2007-04-04 20:27
by Cherni
Well, maybe make the M4 only have single shot.


Take that noob sprayers