Project Reality Forums

Should the MEC pistol sights be fixed.

Vote yes if you think they should, or even if all of the pistol sights should be fixed.

Vote no if you think they shouldn't.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Given the fact that the USMC Anti-Tank Rifleman gets a single AT-4 and an M-16 with 4 magazines and the INS Anti-Tank gets a broken RPG-7 and non-functional pistol sights, I feel that it would only be fair for the sights to be fixed. Therefore, my vote is yes.

The insurgents aren't supposed to be balanced so why are you using the conventional armies as a "balance point". They are supposed to use tactics to accomplish goals rather than pure force.

Personally, I think its okay for now. Recently its been discussed to death, and I don't see how it just NOW spawned as such a nuisance to so many of you. Its been like this since Vanilla BF2, why is now the time to complain?

I vote no. We have better things to fix/add.

Bah..but RPGs come handy against the USMC assets, which insurgents dont have, Blackhawks, tanks, etc...usually youre fvcked, when you run out of RPGs, cos the pistol is useless...at least fix it, or replace it with a light submachine gun, like Uzi or MP5/MP7....

Learn to use it porperly.

No one knows how to use it because they never have.

'[R-DEV wrote:Katarn']The insurgents aren't supposed to be balanced so why are you using the conventional armies as a "balance point". They are supposed to use tactics to accomplish goals rather than pure force.

When I say MEC, I mean MEC/INS.

They use the same pistol.

what a stupid poll .. ffs .. locked.