Why can you wait for .6?

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
ryan d ale
Posts: 1632
Joined: 2007-02-02 15:04

Why can you wait for .6?

Post by ryan d ale »

I saw the opposite of this thread and sure I'm looking foward to .6 but surely there's some things people aren't sure about (apart from the testers!).

I can wait for .6 because
Riflemen optics - the balanced reality lol
Removing A10 on Al Basrah - same thing (even though there is other air support)
Project Reality's Unofficial Self-Appointed Anti vehicle mufti
Over 8 years and still not banned ;)
Obligatory Epic Forum Quote (QFT + LOL)
saXoni: "According to ********'s title their server is for skilled people only, so this doesn't make any sense. Are you sure you were playing on ********?"
Image
Indy Media
bosco_
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 14620
Joined: 2006-12-17 19:04

Post by bosco_ »

What do you mean with "the balanced reality"?
Image
ryan d ale
Posts: 1632
Joined: 2007-02-02 15:04

Post by ryan d ale »

everyone being equal - US M16 with optics because of GB and CH and then MEC because of US.
Project Reality's Unofficial Self-Appointed Anti vehicle mufti
Over 8 years and still not banned ;)
Obligatory Epic Forum Quote (QFT + LOL)
saXoni: "According to ********'s title their server is for skilled people only, so this doesn't make any sense. Are you sure you were playing on ********?"
Image
Indy Media
arthuro12
Posts: 396
Joined: 2007-02-09 16:41

Post by arthuro12 »

aaah cool... :D M16 *drouwls* with optics *ejaculates*
ImageImage
Possibly the sexiest member alive.. I want to tickle your prostate :D
bosco_
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 14620
Joined: 2006-12-17 19:04

Post by bosco_ »

That is not confirmed yet @ arthuro12
Image
Ironcomatose
Posts: 3471
Joined: 2007-02-21 06:07

Post by Ironcomatose »

bosco wrote:That is not confirmed yet @ arthuro12
Yeah it is. It most likely wont be in .6 but it will happen. And how is it unrealistic? The M16A4 that the marines use have the ACCOG 4x scope or at least most marines equip it if they can. If the insurgents or militia get optics then i will be like WTF!? but until then im happy.

[R-DEV]DuneHunter - No offense to any female gamers, but never, ever underestimate the amount of havoc a woman can unleash upon innocent unsuspecting electronics.
BaDbLiTz123
Posts: 55
Joined: 2007-03-25 15:06

Post by BaDbLiTz123 »

Im lookin forward to .6 because i want to be a civilian and act as if im living in a house and stuff
i also want tro throw stones at tanks and other peoples faces
Image
bosco_
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 14620
Joined: 2006-12-17 19:04

Post by bosco_ »

ironcomatose wrote:Yeah it is. It most likely wont be in .6 but it will happen.
I know.
But since this thread is about .6, I referred to that.
Image
101 bassdrive
Posts: 514
Joined: 2007-02-20 15:04

Post by 101 bassdrive »

17square km maps
we get a real horzion worthy its name
trouble causing civilians
deadly jets
it's 0.6, successor of 0.5, and unlike the rocky series, it just keeps getting bigger, better and better
bosco_
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 14620
Joined: 2006-12-17 19:04

Post by bosco_ »

101 bassdrive wrote:17square km maps
we get a real horzion worthy its name
trouble causing civilians
deadly jets
it's 0.6, successor of 0.5, and unlike the rocky series, it just keeps getting bigger, better and better
Shouldn't this go in the "Why can't you wait for .6?" thread? :p
Image
=Romagnolo=
Posts: 4765
Joined: 2006-12-29 14:52

Post by =Romagnolo= »

I can wait beacause I know the amount of work that the devs have to do.
[R-DEV]OkitaMakoto:"Cheers, you're the man, Okita"
[R-DEV]Rhino:"I in fact got kicked from a server for tking."
Hitperson:"well done, treasure it forever."
[R-DEV]Adriaan:"Damned classy Roma, if I may say so."
[R-DEV]Chuc:"Pro man, pro."
(yes, it was about me)
[R-MOD]BloodBane611:"Romagnolo, you definitely deserve a LOL award for that."
tele-loe-
Posts: 324
Joined: 2005-05-22 16:29

Post by tele-loe- »

Long range sniping.. and coordinated massive assaults on the new big map :)
[T]waylay00
Posts: 402
Joined: 2007-04-12 23:08

Post by [T]waylay00 »

17 sq km maps
Farther engagements
Bigger tank battles
New Basrah
ryan d ale
Posts: 1632
Joined: 2007-02-02 15:04

Post by ryan d ale »

=Romagnolo= wrote:I can wait beacause I know the amount of work that the devs have to do.
Awww
Project Reality's Unofficial Self-Appointed Anti vehicle mufti
Over 8 years and still not banned ;)
Obligatory Epic Forum Quote (QFT + LOL)
saXoni: "According to ********'s title their server is for skilled people only, so this doesn't make any sense. Are you sure you were playing on ********?"
Image
Indy Media
Outlawz7
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17261
Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59

Post by Outlawz7 »

arthuro12 wrote:aaah cool... :D M16 *drouwls* with optics *ejaculates*

Ewwww, yuck....

BaDbLiTz123 wrote:Im lookin forward to .6 because i want to be a civilian and act as if im living in a house and stuff
i also want tro throw stones at tanks and other peoples faces
Hey, me too, we should be neighbours and rock the tanks together :p
Image
Top_Cat_AxJnAt
Posts: 3215
Joined: 2006-02-02 17:13

Post by Top_Cat_AxJnAt »

NO M16 OPTICS TILL 0.7

AND

NO ASSULT RIFLES WITH GL AND SCOPE TILL 0.7


THis is not fact, but pretty damn close to it. How do i know, i can read the DEVs posts......... ;-) *cues creepy music*!








O and the answer to the thread question, is the British Warrior IFV, the best armour infantry transport vehicle that will be in the game, and so for a long while to come (bradely - 25mm + stabilzation, hahaa, how is Radern not properly stabalized, i will never treuly know, retards)!
trogdor1289
Posts: 5201
Joined: 2006-03-26 04:04

Post by trogdor1289 »

NO M16 OPTICS TILL 0.7

AND

NO ASSAULT RIFLES WITH GL AND SCOPE TILL 0.7
;)
Now just try to figure at which I am winking, If I am truly winking or whether I am just completely messing with you bwa ha ha.
bosco_
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 14620
Joined: 2006-12-17 19:04

Post by bosco_ »

Don't mess with the masses.
Or we will rise up one day.
Image
arthuro12
Posts: 396
Joined: 2007-02-09 16:41

Post by arthuro12 »

.... i need a new PR name.. i still have that noobified name: Arthuro12... any suggestions? SupaHL337WanKo?
ImageImage
Possibly the sexiest member alive.. I want to tickle your prostate :D
Top_Cat_AxJnAt
Posts: 3215
Joined: 2006-02-02 17:13

Post by Top_Cat_AxJnAt »

'[R-PUB wrote:trogdor1289']NO M16 OPTICS TILL 0.7

AND

NO ASSAULT RIFLES WITH GL AND SCOPE TILL 0.7
;)
Now just try to figure at which I am winking, If I am truly winking or whether I am just completely messing with you bwa ha ha.

I dont give a damn about what you are winking at, therefore totaly defeating your smugness and amusement at knowing information we dont know! :p

However, we alll know the G3 with optics will appear in 0.6

The reason for not including the Chinese bullpup assult rifle with UGL and SCOPE is becuase it would unbalance the teams (you get the idea at least - very powerfull), therefore the DEVs stated that they intend to wait till they can include the assult rifle with UGL and SCOPE for all the teams, namely the UK, US, MEC and CHinese teams.

However, this is based on the idea, that supposid DEV statements, and NOT WINKS, are fact and not dirty rotton lies.


p.s Doing a hell of ajob, Trog and all the DEVs and for that, i am willing to wait till the end of my time to a see PR to play it as you deam fit! :D Total and utter complete trust in your decisions, achnologing ofcourse, that you are only highly developed apes! :D WHOOO HUUHUHUH WHOOOO
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”