Posted: 2007-06-03 13:22
SMAW, hmm..
Loved the MK12 though.
Loved the MK12 though.
Project Reality Forums
Bring Back the SMAW and Mk12 Sniper?
Page 1 of 2
Posted: 2007-06-03 13:27
Are they currently in use by the USMC?
Posted: 2007-06-03 13:30
Yes
And is the MK12 that silenced marksman rifle that was in .4?, if so, i dont want it back, unless its unsilenced.
And is the MK12 that silenced marksman rifle that was in .4?, if so, i dont want it back, unless its unsilenced.
Posted: 2007-06-03 13:38
If they made it more powerful than a BB gun then yes. 
Posted: 2007-06-03 14:18
I liked the suppressed rifle and it should be underpowered to mimic the less powerful subsonic rounds.
I would like it back.
The SMAW I really don't care one way or the other because a rocket launcher is a rocket launcher.
I would like it back.
The SMAW I really don't care one way or the other because a rocket launcher is a rocket launcher.
Posted: 2007-06-03 14:20
Bob says: Yes!
Bring them back, though prefurubly remove the crooked sights from the SMAW
The Mk.11 would probubly be best as a pick up kit in the vein of the M95 and whatnot.
Bring them back, though prefurubly remove the crooked sights from the SMAW
The Mk.11 would probubly be best as a pick up kit in the vein of the M95 and whatnot.
Posted: 2007-06-03 15:25
The SMAW i think was the placeholder for the AT4, usint the SMAW from USI.
Posted: 2007-06-03 15:28
it would be cool if the SMAW and the AT4 could change randomly so that you never know what baby you get when ordering an AT kit
Posted: 2007-06-03 15:34
But the SMAW does much more than just AT. I want to see it come back with something like a HE-DP or Thermobaric warhead.Blackhawk 5 wrote:The SMAW i think was the placeholder for the AT4, usint the SMAW from USI.
Posted: 2007-06-03 16:21
AT4 has that capability too. I say no to SMAW but the SR-25 should be used if there are any special forces maps that occur in the distant future.
Posted: 2007-06-03 16:33
AT4 is the more commonly used varient as far as I know.
I always thought the SMAW looked hideous anyway.
I always thought the SMAW looked hideous anyway.
Posted: 2007-06-03 16:49
Eddie says: No.
Posted: 2007-06-03 17:13
Personally, i dont want the SMAW, my "yes" comment was whether it is currently used, as an infantry weapon its hideous and too big, the AT4 is much better, its low profile and it deals the damage it needs to.
Im pretty happy with the M14 at the moment, its way better than what the Mk 12 was like in the game.
"AT4 has that capability too. I say no to SMAW but the SR-25 should be used if there are any special forces maps that occur in the distant future."
Why cant it be used for the modern maps?, from my understanding its been around for quite a number of years.
Im pretty happy with the M14 at the moment, its way better than what the Mk 12 was like in the game.
"AT4 has that capability too. I say no to SMAW but the SR-25 should be used if there are any special forces maps that occur in the distant future."
Why cant it be used for the modern maps?, from my understanding its been around for quite a number of years.
Posted: 2007-06-03 17:44
I wouldn't want to trade the M14 for it but I like shooting people by surprise.
Posted: 2007-06-03 17:45
i think the Mk12 will come back
when? at the time when the defs put in the US Army as a new faction which will come with version 0.8 or 1.0 i guess (in 0.7 we will get the new M16A4s and scoped Rifles with UGL for all factions so in 0.8 or 1.0 will be time adding the ARMY
when? at the time when the defs put in the US Army as a new faction which will come with version 0.8 or 1.0 i guess (in 0.7 we will get the new M16A4s and scoped Rifles with UGL for all factions so in 0.8 or 1.0 will be time adding the ARMY