Page 1 of 2

Posted: 2007-06-08 16:43
by daranz
I believe it's a C-5 Galaxy

Posted: 2007-06-08 16:46
by Zodiaccup
daranz wrote:I believe it's a C-5 Galaxy
Ahh O.K., i thought it is something like an AC-130.

Posted: 2007-06-08 16:47
by Rhino
Zodiaccup wrote:i thought it is an AC-130.
.....

http://www.ndu.edu/nwc/nwcCLIPARt/US_AI ... ctre01.jpg

Posted: 2007-06-08 16:48
by Blackhawk 5
AC-130 has propellers, 2 gattling guns, howitzer, and 1 other gun i cant remember, as well as propellers. The C130 i believe does not tilt its nose up for the front loading bay correct me if im wrong.

Posted: 2007-06-08 17:00
by daranz
C-5 is over two times larger than the C-130.

Check out this photo: http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0652371/M/ . There's a Galaxy on the ground, and two C-130 Herculeses behind it.

Posted: 2007-06-08 17:02
by Zodiaccup
Just another proof, that my knowledge about military equipment/vehicles is very limited, shame on me. ^^

Image
Image

Edit: Thanks for the link daranz.

Posted: 2007-06-08 18:01
by Bobert08
No need to get snappy just because he doesn't know as much about airplanes as you :lol:

Posted: 2007-06-08 18:19
by ArmedDrunk&Angry
Wow !
I knew the C5 was bigger but that pic really shows how much.
I have a pic of a B17 flying next to a B52 and it's a similiar ratio.

Posted: 2007-06-08 18:23
by Blackhawk 5
C5 or C17 i get confused

C17 Globemaster - http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/c-17.htm

Posted: 2007-06-08 18:31
by KP
Actually, me thinks it could be an Antonov something-or-other...

Posted: 2007-06-08 18:41
by Bob_Marley
KP wrote:Actually, me thinks it could be an Antonov something-or-other...
Yeah, I always thought it was a Russian bird...

Posted: 2007-06-08 19:08
by Cheeseman
It is NOT a C-5 Galaxy; it is an Antonov An-124 aircraft. How can you guys mistake the T-tail on the C5 with the Antonov's low-set tail as seen in Battlefield 2? I'm glad to see that at least KP got it right.

Here are some photos of the An-124:
Image
Image
Image
As seen in PR's Al Basrah map.

Posted: 2007-06-08 19:18
by Hitperson
hmm why is there a 124 on basarah??

herky bird statics would be great.

Posted: 2007-06-08 21:24
by Nimble
I'd hate to imagine actually landing one of those on that puny Al Basrah airstrip :lol:

Posted: 2007-06-08 21:25
by Blackhawk 5
Planes transport are designed to land on short runways to provide quick supply, or am i watching too many C130 documentery.

Posted: 2007-06-08 21:27
by eddie
I don't think they're designed to land on short runways. They're designed to be able to fly low-level and "drop" cargo out of the back on pallets.

Posted: 2007-06-08 21:29
by Hitperson
yeah well a C5 is designed to operate off short rough strips.

Posted: 2007-06-08 21:42
by daranz
C130s are designed to have jets attached, for short takeoff for purposes of showing off at airshows!

Posted: 2007-06-08 23:37
by wushu1
JATO FTW!!!