Page 1 of 1
AGM-114 vs AGM-65/ Kh-25: Damage is weird
Posted: 2007-09-09 06:50
by CAS_117
Ok I just got off of 64 Kashan and I realized to my dismay that the AGM-65's need two hit to kill a tank. Which would be ok if the AGM-114 took at least that many. I just think its weird for a missile with a 8.2 kg warhead to be more powerful than a missile who's warhead is almost two times the total mass of the AGM-114. I just think that the damage of the Hellfire should be switched with the Maverick and AS-10. I'm pretty sure that a reactive armored tank would take about 2 hellfires to completely destroy anyways.
Posted: 2007-09-09 07:33
by PlatinumA1
erm just spray wit gau-8 and fire one agm-114 , and the tank is dead
Posted: 2007-09-09 07:43
by CAS_117
Ok obviously I need to simplify this.
Posted: 2007-09-09 08:10
by ZaZZo
lmao @ picture
Posted: 2007-09-09 08:54
by Hardtman
I agree that the effectivity compared to the weight is kinda strange. I guess this will be one of the things the dev's will look into when they overhaul the airplane system.
But as far as I know, a Hellfire can kill a even a tank with reactive armor, since one of the possible warheads for a hellfire is a tandem-shaped charged, specifically designed to counter reactive armor.
Oh,and the picture is great
.
Posted: 2007-09-09 11:44
by Brummy
BOOOOM! That picture rocks lol.
Posted: 2007-09-12 00:03
by BobAndy
that is quite possibly the best picture ever.
Posted: 2007-09-12 00:12
by El_Vikingo
Is the spark the explosion, or is the circle the explosion circumference?
Posted: 2007-09-12 01:22
by Falkun
El_Vikingo wrote:Is the spark the explosion, or is the circle the explosion circumference?
No, the circle is the bomb
Posted: 2007-09-12 05:27
by CAS_117
Falkun wrote:No, the circle is the bomb
Don't make me break out photoshop!
