Project Reality Forums

i havent played kashan much since the patch (damn u graphics card) but when i did play it before my computer got all wired one of these could have really been used, anychance of one being added to the map in the future?

Kashan is a really good setting for them but I think we're only giving them to the US when they have no MBTs.

You're taking away the MBT's? :<

No, well, I doubt it.

All he's saying is that TOW humvees only appear where the faction the US is fighting against has tanks, but the US does not. Such as on Qwai.

This is not the case on Kashan and so as the MBTs will almost certainly not be being removed, they will not appear.

If the MBT goes, kashan would be better, but it will also lose the thing many like it for. But i support it if you do

I would rather see More attack Helicopters being layed out, aswell as more tanks.. instead of THE Air to Surfice aircrafts.. tanks stand no chance against them

Kashan does need a TOW HMMWV, i suggested this back in the beta. It's not that they need more AT but it allows the infantry a transport with anti-tank capability that isn't offered by the APC. I say add 1 or 2.

Swe_Olsson wrote:I would rather see More attack Helicopters being layed out, aswell as more tanks.. instead of THE Air to Surfice aircrafts.. tanks stand no chance against them

Actually tanks are probably chopter pilots greatest fear in PR. Atleast when im in one So damn easy to shoot down those things

Waaah_Wah wrote:Actually tanks are probably chopter pilots greatest fear in PR. Atleast when im in one So damn easy to shoot down those things

DAMN YOU MAN!! I clicked on your sig!!! YOU *******


There should be a warning on that thing.

Most of the stuff is well balanced, it is when you get an average player in a tank against a really good pilot and gunner combo with a spotter that people screem "oh the tanks stand no chance". Or the other way round, if you know what your doing, and the chopper pilot isn´t an expert, you can shoot them down unbelievable easily.

If the units are not individually balanced, like M1A1 Abrams vs T55 for example, leave it to the mappers to balance it via numbers / timers / etc. Or have the map have a distinct slant (Like Operation Rolling Thunder, for a made up example, the US Army has armour superiority in that they have three M1A1 Abrams, and the Militia has only two T55's (which have no zoom or something). So, how do you do this map as militia? Ambush the US tanks, and don't send your tanks against their tanks.

I see no problem with the suggestion. It's just one step in moving away from carbon copying balancing. I'd rather see a mismatch number of tanks on each side. Something like 6 tanks for the U.S, 9 for the MEC. At the same time give the U.S a couple of TOW Humvees to help against the MEC's armor advantage.

ironcomatose wrote:DAMN YOU MAN!! I clicked on your sig!!! YOU *******


There should be a warning on that thing.

Told you not to click it.. Why, oh why dont ppl listen??

Waaah_Wah wrote:Told you not to click it.. Why, oh why dont ppl listen??

I don't know what the hell is in that link, but I'm not clicking it. I'm assuming this link was removed on the TBF2 forums in your sig, so what makes you think it appropriate on this forum then? Oh yeah, and some people might accidently click on it...

very bad joke.

and dude, we have kids on these forums, common.