Page 1 of 3

New Firing sigth for C.A.S. Heli ?

Posted: 2007-12-04 17:56
by Hotrod525
Ok, my friend shoot me a link from youtube, showing AWESOME guner view for COBRA! The video description say it was Project Reality sight, but i know FLIR is a USI view... anyway. Just take a look, its AWESOME.

http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=53_AJLTbnUo[/youtube]

Its look AWESOME who agreed :mrgreen:

Posted: 2007-12-04 18:01
by 77SiCaRiO77
its project reality , with the cobra sigh edited .

Posted: 2007-12-04 18:17
by Hotrod525
USI got THERMAL FLIR for as gunner view... its a mix from PR and USI sight... its nice... done nicely its can add alot of realism to PR.

Posted: 2007-12-04 18:37
by Ragni<RangersPL>
77SiCaRiO77 wrote:its project reality , with the cobra sigh edited .
Yes it is from PR and yes it was edited.
Ammo counter doesn't work (it shows 240 rounds all the time) :razz: It looks like a fake to me 8-)

Posted: 2007-12-04 18:47
by bosco_
I lol so hard about people in the comments thinking it's real.

Posted: 2007-12-04 18:56
by markonymous
why make a video just to screw ppl?
dunno why it couldnt be real. its just colored textures...

edit: never mind i watched it more carefully. looks like a fake to me.

Posted: 2007-12-04 18:56
by Hotrod525
[R-PUB]bosco wrote:I lol so hard about people in the comments thinking it's real.

Thats prove DEV team is making a good job XD

Posted: 2007-12-04 19:20
by SuperArmy
yeh that looks copied form a real footage from an Apache.

Posted: 2007-12-04 19:29
by Viper5
haha thats from PR. The guy sprinting across the road is yours truly IIRC.

Posted: 2007-12-04 20:13
by CareBear
yer i remember the original, showing off the new cobra zooms etc, copied the vid that was on the internet somewhere, and then some 1 else has come along and edited it :D

Posted: 2007-12-04 20:50
by Thunder
that clip was in a pr trailer, until people found it offensive as it mirrors a real life operation

Posted: 2007-12-04 21:06
by Mongolian_dude
[R-MOD]Thunder wrote:that clip was in a pr trailer, until people found it offensive as it mirrors a real life operation
Unlike PR, eh? ;-)

...mongol...

Posted: 2007-12-04 22:32
by Hotrod525
[R-MOD]Thunder wrote:that clip was in a pr trailer, until people found it offensive as it mirrors a real life operation
Are you serious LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL.
Its like to say since GTA3 and others have been released, drug dealing, street killing, and Gang warfare have been improved LOL.

Posted: 2007-12-05 03:03
by Masaq
Hotrod525 wrote:Are you serious LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL.
Its like to say since GTA3 and others have been released, drug dealing, street killing, and Gang warfare have been improved LOL.
Uh... no-one said that the trailer would increase deaths in Iraq. The objection to it was that it took a real-life incident and exactly replicated it, using the genuine voice-over.

I can fully understand why people might find that a little distasteful.

Posted: 2007-12-05 09:32
by Swe_Olsson
if you look really closely, you can see masaq & mongol hiding underneath that truck..

Posted: 2007-12-05 15:20
by Gyberg
It is, as others have pointed out, an exact reinactment of an actual event. The pilot and gunner were court-martialled since wounded troops not returning fire shouldn't be considered as valid targets. (I might be wrong conserning the cort-martial but im 75% sure....)

Posted: 2007-12-05 15:24
by Outlawz7
Hotrod525 wrote:AWESOME
Hyperactive much?

Posted: 2007-12-05 15:28
by Hotrod525
Gyberg wrote:It is, as others have pointed out, an exact reinactment of an actual event. The pilot and gunner were court-martialled since wounded troops not returning fire shouldn't be considered as valid targets. (I might be wrong conserning the cort-martial but im 75% sure....)

Huuum... they where active combatant ? They can be engaged no ?

I just try to figure it out in my head... You're in the desert of Irak... you seen hostile...they dont fire at you... what are you suppose to do ? Get back to base and forgot what you seen ?

I know ROE autorise you to engage civilian if they represent's an eminant treath to you or you're unit. ( Canadian kill civilian on a CheckPoint cause they dont stop and try to pass trought. 2 kids... what a waste...) So Why it would not let you engage hostile cause they dont shoot at you ?

Posted: 2007-12-05 15:32
by Outlawz7
I know ROE autorise you to engage civilian if they represent's an eminant treath to you or you're unit.
1. Tons of grammar/spell errors.

2. How can a civilian be a threat?

Posted: 2007-12-05 15:35
by Gyberg
Hotrod525 wrote:I just try to figure it out in my head... You're in the desert of Irak... you seen hostile...they dont fire at you... what are you suppose to do ? Get back to base and forgot what you seen ?
You didn't read did you? I said wounded... They fired at them, he goes down, is still moving but wounded and they say something like: hit them again... that is were it all goes wrong...