My thoughts on .75
Posted: 2008-03-20 20:26
Fantastic. That's just one word though...
I found .7 to be very annoying, to the point I couldn't stand to play.. the stupid amount of time it took to stabilize yourself was just annoying, now it's just about right.
But the main thing that has made .75 such a success imo is how much better infantry combat has gotten, with a decent squad laying down cover fire whilst men flank it is now brilliant. Cover fire won't grant you a victory how ever, as the enemy can use it as well. Op archer is great, but I knew it would be... and the MG is now worth using. Personally I feel any changes to the game now would ruin it
. Minus adding mortars!
ECKO!
I found .7 to be very annoying, to the point I couldn't stand to play.. the stupid amount of time it took to stabilize yourself was just annoying, now it's just about right.
But the main thing that has made .75 such a success imo is how much better infantry combat has gotten, with a decent squad laying down cover fire whilst men flank it is now brilliant. Cover fire won't grant you a victory how ever, as the enemy can use it as well. Op archer is great, but I knew it would be... and the MG is now worth using. Personally I feel any changes to the game now would ruin it
. Minus adding mortars!ECKO!