Page 1 of 3
Posted: 2008-04-05 12:26
by Celica`
PanzerFaust 3, for HAT
and AT4 for LAT.
Posted: 2008-04-05 13:26
by Maxfragg
that makes it easy, you will not have to make one by your self

Posted: 2008-04-05 23:38
by Glimmerman
I thought we were going for the GILL ATGM?
Posted: 2008-04-05 23:43
by Celica`
As what?
We're getting the PzF3 anyways, from the Germans.
Posted: 2008-04-06 10:52
by Celica`
HAT; Gill ATGM
LAT; PzF III
Posted: 2008-04-08 01:16
by azn_chopsticks_boi
At first we were planning on using the Pzf3 as a LAT but the devs stated a re loadable LAT would be a bad idea.
Posted: 2008-04-08 11:25
by Glimmerman
As light AT class i thought we had the AT-4?
The AT-4 and Pzf-3 are fine by me but we need to choose one or keep them both.
Posted: 2008-04-08 12:16
by Glimmerman
You move it with 2 people, one has the launcher the other the missile cannisters.
Posted: 2008-04-08 14:23
by Glimmerman
Problem is we need a guided weapon.
Posted: 2008-04-08 15:15
by Glimmerman
The general idea is that its used like the standard HAT kit does now so it will be a shoulder launched version.
Re: LAT/HAT
Posted: 2008-05-16 10:18
by Celica`
Well see what the germans do aswell
In my eyes we could use the PZF for LAT and just give it one round
Re: LAT/HAT
Posted: 2008-05-16 12:55
by Glimmerman
Panzerfaust III with Dynarange for LAT and Gill MRAT for HAT.
Re: LAT/HAT
Posted: 2008-05-16 13:39
by azn_chopsticks_boi
Glimmerman wrote:Panzerfaust III with Dynarange for LAT and Gill MRAT for HAT.
I would strongly disagree, we are using the Panzerfaust III IT-6000 as the HAT, and if two factions use the same weapons, I would think the weapons would be the same class.
As stated above, a reloadable LAT would not be the best idea, thats the reaon why the RPG is being replace soon.
Edit:
But if you are planning to use the Panzerfaust III, there were 2 forms that I asked to be created.
One being the nomarl Panzerfaust III and the PzF3 IT-6000.