Technical speed
Posted: 2008-05-08 21:46
I checked this on search and came up with nothing.I just like to put things out there so that people can debate with me on wether they should be encorperated or wether they dissagree.
I find the technical speeds to be too fast. Whenever i see videos of gunships or anything like that blasting technicals, it takes them forever to move and are usually sitting ducks. I know a diesel engines are powerful and might have good accelleration on low gears, and can reach around 60 miles an hour on the straight but currently in PR they reach racecar performance levels on acceleration! Switching gears arnt that fluid, i know the BF2 engine doesnt have gears, but somehow they should be simulated accuratly. Anyone got a preference or opinion on soft-skin vehicle speeds and more directly...Technical speeds?
Thanks.
I find the technical speeds to be too fast. Whenever i see videos of gunships or anything like that blasting technicals, it takes them forever to move and are usually sitting ducks. I know a diesel engines are powerful and might have good accelleration on low gears, and can reach around 60 miles an hour on the straight but currently in PR they reach racecar performance levels on acceleration! Switching gears arnt that fluid, i know the BF2 engine doesnt have gears, but somehow they should be simulated accuratly. Anyone got a preference or opinion on soft-skin vehicle speeds and more directly...Technical speeds?
Thanks.