Page 1 of 1

.8 Basrah

Posted: 2008-07-07 17:01
by RCMoonPie
Not sure if this has been mentioned or not....

If it has.....I sincerely apologize.

I "stopped in" after a long break from the forums on my lunch today and didnt have time to do a full search on the matter.

I was just wondering if in the new .8, if Al Basrah could be implemented with the U.S. Army vs. insurgents?

I love playing the insurgency game mode and I love this map as I feel it offers a well-rounded sense of game-play covering many different elements of combat.

Thanks for your time.

Re: .8 Basrah

Posted: 2008-07-07 17:07
by Fluffywuffy
As Duckhunt (the map creator) said he wants it to be strictly British army.

But hey we got Fallujah ;)

Re: .8 Basrah

Posted: 2008-07-07 17:09
by G.Drew
Feuerwaffen wrote:As Duckhunt (the map creator) said he wants it to be strictly British army.

But hey we got Fallujah ;)
exactly, u getz bran nU map, be happie! :mrgreen:

Re: .8 Basrah

Posted: 2008-07-07 17:13
by Fluffywuffy
G.Drew wrote:exactly, u getz bran nU map, be happie! :mrgreen:
ODOYLE RULEZ!

Yeah but I've heard talk wither it'll be USMC or US Army?

Re: .8 Basrah

Posted: 2008-07-07 17:19
by RCMoonPie
Dont get me wrong.....I love playing as the Brits!

I just thought it would be an interesting mix-up.

Maybe set up the scenarios to where the Brits have moved onto a previously held US spot and the US.....you get the picture.

What about a Brit playable Kashan?

Re: .8 Basrah

Posted: 2008-07-07 17:27
by Craz3y|Assasin
Yea we get falugha way better than brasah jk

Re: .8 Basrah

Posted: 2008-07-07 18:32
by 00SoldierofFortune00
Having the British on Basrah is realistic and Basrah has bigger problems then armies on it. How about the advantage that the Insurgents have on it?

Re: .8 Basrah

Posted: 2008-07-07 18:55
by RCMoonPie
No one said it was unrealistic.

The question and suggestion was the possibility of putting the new .8 US Army in the foray.

Please stick to the subject.

Thanks

Re: .8 Basrah

Posted: 2008-07-07 18:58
by 00SoldierofFortune00
RCMoonPie wrote:No one said it was unrealistic.

The question and suggestion was the possibility of putting the new .8 US Army in the foray.

Please stick to the subject.

Thanks
It is on subject....

And you misunderstood what I said. The point of having the British on Basrah is because it is realistic and thats why the USMC was replaced on it. The DEVs and map creators are trying to make the maps based off of real life locations similar to those of realistic battle locations.

Same reason why ColoredFox is determining which army is realistc to put on his Afganistan map.

Re: .8 Basrah

Posted: 2008-07-07 19:01
by RCMoonPie
But it isnt "unrealistic" either.

Whatever dude.

Only a suggestion.

Re: .8 Basrah

Posted: 2008-07-07 19:04
by Dunehunter
Locking for re-suggestion. The US side in general was taken out of Basrah for realism reasons and won't be making a return.