Project Reality Forums

no!!! i dont play crisis but i thought this would be col for pr...u dont have to make whole forests able to be run over by tanks..but maybe a few taht could be taken out by c4 or light at..so infantry can knck one over and use it as cover in a fire fight...would be cool

we already have enough problems with dest buildings reaching the max limit of networkables....

its laggy, and you are only allowed to have 1024 destructable objects on a map (bf2 limitations)

And usually, you want your map to have at most 300 destructable objects in order to not make it lag.

This suggestion made me think of Battlefield B-company. It'd never work right though, not in the BF2 engine. Maybe in BF3, but not here.

that would be awesome! ya think there could be just a few destructible large trees in an urban setting that would fall over for infantry to hide behind

If you have a limit on destructable objects, maybe dont add destroyable trees in urban settings, as you want to have buildings to tear down. But in forest maps, there would be room for a few places to have such trees. Especially around a CP.

Adding "some" destructible trees... won't add too much to the game, I think. Unless you use those as bloccades or something. That you have to destroy the trees to get through a passage way. But otherwise, meh.

Don't get me wrong, I like the idea (although it's been suggested before), but in this engine, it's not going to happen I'm afraid.

what about allowing tanks to drive through the thin trees simulating a tank's bad@$$sness

if ya do that then also allow them to drive through light poles

HughJass wrote:its laggy, and you are only allowed to have 1024 destructable objects on a map (bf2 limitations)

And usually, you want your map to have at most 300 destructable objects in order to not make it lag.

right..forgot bout that