Page 1 of 1
underbarrel grenade launchers
Posted: 2008-07-12 07:42
by charliegrs
i just had a few questions about under barrel grenade launchers for .8
1. will the usmc get a scoped m16a4 with gl?
2. will the US army get a m4 with gl?
3. will the MEC get a g3 with gl?
i think you see where im going with this. any insight would be greatly appreciated.
Re: underbarrel grenade launchers
Posted: 2008-07-12 07:45
by fuzzhead
1. 2. 3. yes.
stay tuned for more dev journals...
Re: underbarrel grenade launchers
Posted: 2008-07-12 08:35
by Katarn
M4 & ACOG & M203 is wayyy to tacticool for school. In my hands.
Re: underbarrel grenade launchers
Posted: 2008-07-12 08:36
by +SiN+headhunter
wish not. i hate the gla
Re: underbarrel grenade launchers
Posted: 2008-07-12 08:36
by ReaperMAC
[R-DEV]Katarn wrote:M4 & ACOG & M203 is wayyy to tacticool for school. In my hands.
Pics or it's not true

Re: underbarrel grenade launchers
Posted: 2008-07-12 09:37
by bosco_
Reaper, you know what I think about this, don't you?

Re: underbarrel grenade launchers
Posted: 2008-07-12 10:16
by arjan
i think the Grenadiers would be better of with an m68 aimpoint? not?

Re: underbarrel grenade launchers
Posted: 2008-07-12 10:18
by ReaperMAC
[R-PUB]bosco wrote:Reaper, you know what I think about this, don't you?
Yes, of course

Re: underbarrel grenade launchers
Posted: 2008-07-12 10:24
by Maxfragg
arjan wrote:i think the Grenadiers would be better of with an m68 aimpoint? not?
why should they, the chinese already got a scoped gl rifle, the UK will get it anyway, and i had been known in the forums for some time, that some point all factions will gain scopes for the grenadier.
So its great to hear that we will get them, the only question is:
Is the L85A2 GL SUSAT also in 0.8? - nevermind if not, as long as we get the other new rifles

Re: underbarrel grenade launchers
Posted: 2008-07-12 11:21
by IAJTHOMAS
Good news, although I've got a soft spot for the current MEC GL (AK101?), fills the CQB gap, and has the GL for ranged combat.
Re: underbarrel grenade launchers
Posted: 2008-07-12 11:31
by Harrod200
Yea, the 101 kicks ***. Less recoil, good accuracy, bigger mag, UGL and more ammo.
Re: underbarrel grenade launchers
Posted: 2008-07-12 12:33
by arjan
Maxfragg wrote:why should they?
Arent the most M4's with UGL mostly equiped with an M68 aimpoint in the Army?
Thought so.
Re: underbarrel grenade launchers
Posted: 2008-07-12 12:54
by ReaperMAC
arjan wrote:Arent the most M4's with UGL mostly equiped with an M68 aimpoint in the Army?
Thought so.
That depends on the situation. In PR assault rifles with grenade launchers for conventional armies are getting scopes. Not sure about milita or insurgents, but I doubt it.
Re: underbarrel grenade launchers
Posted: 2008-07-12 13:51
by arjan
ReaperMAC wrote:That depends on the situation. In PR assault rifles with grenade launchers for conventional armies are getting scopes. Not sure about milita or insurgents, but I doubt it.
i learn something everyday

what kinda situations?
Re: underbarrel grenade launchers
Posted: 2008-07-12 14:05
by Expendable Grunt
I'd think the aimpont would be for CQC oriented loadouts, and the ACOG the generic one.
Re: underbarrel grenade launchers
Posted: 2008-07-12 15:10
by Airsoft
just a question if the M16a4 gets a heatshield like m16a2 for the m203 IRL?
Re: underbarrel grenade launchers
Posted: 2008-07-12 18:07
by Katarn
It does not, as aforementioned in the dev journal thread.
Re: underbarrel grenade launchers
Posted: 2008-07-12 21:14
by KP
All the questions have been answered: yes, yes and yes. It is also evident from the video posted in the DEV journal. Therefore, this gets the lock.
