Page 1 of 2

Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-24 20:48
by unrealalex
Man I was just looking through their vehicles, and they have some really cool stuff!
US Intervention » - Vehicles

Imagine PR + such a variety of vehicles = win.

I don't think there's enough variety in PR =/
I mean:

jeep with 50 cal
apc
tank
transport chopper
attack chopper

and thats it pretty much. Most maps have like two or 3 of those usually. I think Battle of Qinling has the biggest variety of vehicles and its rarely played now.

Why no vehicles like the MLRS, howitzers, Bradley? Where's the apache? Still no insurgent map with an apache =/

I like PR but all the vehicles are getting stale :(

Re: Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-24 20:53
by marcoelnk
USI granted PR with the right to use all USI max files (so the objects without code,texture,UV afaik)...

Re: Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-24 21:23
by HughJass
all i want is the deadly artillery and the rocket artillery in pr. those things are so fun to use.

Re: Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-24 21:28
by CodeRedFox
unrealalex wrote: I don't think there's enough variety in PR =/
I mean:
Here my cut and paste response to questions like that:

Project Reality : Battlefield 2 Mod - Joining the Team

Or joining one of the community factions.

People always think this is a company when its only a group of people (all over the world) somehow getting a game out :-P

Re: Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-24 21:34
by sakils2
People always think this is a company when its only a group of people (all over the world) somehow getting a game out
And BTW, you're making a God damn GREAT game ;)

Re: Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-24 21:34
by Rhino
I take it you where meant to show the team page CRF?

Re: Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-24 21:36
by Outlawz7
USi isn't really a milk cow for PR to feed off content...

Re: Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-24 21:43
by CodeRedFox
[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:I take it you where meant to show the team page CRF?
Nope, the email with joining the team is on that page. The point is as you know, the best way to get something in PR is to get it in yourself and get involved. And I'm not saying that to be a ***, its the same way I became part of the team.

I understand allot of people cant model of texture. But that goes back to were just bunch of dudes creating a mod :mrgreen:

Re: Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-24 22:21
by Rhino

Re: Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-24 22:27
by gazzthompson
unrealalex wrote: Why no vehicles like the MLRS, howitzers, Bradley? Where's the apache? Still no insurgent map with an apache =/

I like PR but all the vehicles are getting stale :(
both apache and Bradley are on kashan

https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f196-p ... rbala.html

apache on insurgency map ^^^

Re: Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-24 22:41
by Rhino
the Apache we have is the one we made and not the one from USI :p

Re: Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-24 23:25
by daranz
USI is first gulf war. So, some of US equipment is out, since it's been taken out of use since. Artillery is also out, since there is none in PR. A bunch of warsaw pact equipment is also somewhat rusty and would be good mainly for militia.

So yeah, you can't really take all of USI vehicles and put them in PR, as they wouldn't fit very well. The Hind is sexy, though.

Re: Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-25 00:08
by unrealalex
daranz wrote:USI is first gulf war. So, some of US equipment is out, since it's been taken out of use since. Artillery is also out, since there is none in PR. A bunch of warsaw pact equipment is also somewhat rusty and would be good mainly for militia.

So yeah, you can't really take all of USI vehicles and put them in PR, as they wouldn't fit very well. The Hind is sexy, though.
Ah I see. We dont use howitzers anymore?

Man that Karbala map is siick! I cant wait till its in. Also, all the times I've played Kashan i've never seen an apache or a bradley.

Re: Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-25 00:38
by charliegrs
unrealalex wrote:Ah I see. We dont use howitzers anymore?

Man that Karbala map is siick! I cant wait till its in. Also, all the times I've played Kashan i've never seen an apache or a bradley.
i think what he means is player controlled artillery hasnt been implemented in PR yet and it may or may not in the future. judging from the map sizes it probably wouldnt be very realistic to have player controlled artillery. which is why we have off the map commander controlled artillery. but yes we still use howitzers and paladins etc.

Re: Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-25 10:36
by Rudd
unrealalex wrote:Ah I see. We dont use howitzers anymore?

Man that Karbala map is siick! I cant wait till its in. Also, all the times I've played Kashan i've never seen an apache or a bradley.
look closer then LOL, or look around on LAN

Artillery etc is the area attack depending on what map, I would like this asset to be developed more, but its there

think of it this way, what is the range of a howitzer/MRLS etc, how big is a PR map?
..................
exactly.

Re: Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-25 11:11
by sav112
A few more transport options would be good, walking for 10 mins having a fire-fight or worse just getting shot then its back to spawn point. Goood to have the odd bike re-moded for Mutt....as the bikes are well I dont know, think 1942 had it spot on with them.....

Guy showed me the other night joysticks are a fight to the use of a mouse in the Heli's...keyboard and mouse and flying as sweet as a nut...

I would not mind so much if you actually could move around better than a slug…It’s the one option I just don’t get limiting a soldiers running pace to 15 seconds….best just to have it back in the land of reality and let us just get on with it.

Re: Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-25 11:24
by hellbounde
the one thing IMO that PR is missing is mortars, these are so important for assaulting villages...

ya i agree the vehicles are getting stale, there is not enough of them, the main transport choppers are merlin and UH-60.. what happened to the Chinook!! :P

Re: Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-25 11:37
by GeneralNorth
hellbounde wrote:the one thing IMO that PR is missing is mortars, these are so important for assaulting villages...

ya i agree the vehicles are getting stale, there is not enough of them, the main transport choppers are merlin and UH-60.. what happened to the Chinook!! :P
i believe the chinook is currently being implemented in next version. :razz:

Re: Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-25 11:41
by hellbounde
AWESOME!!

Chinook just complete owns!!

The portable stuff for infantry is still missing though

and also maybe instead of having to request a kit you could mix and match from ammo boxes, i know there would be problems with ppl picking up a sniper, c4 and everything, but there could be requirements :)

Re: Wouldn't it be awesome if PR had all the USI models :P?

Posted: 2008-10-25 13:46
by Dirtboy
Ok guys, lets be serious.

As of right now, Project reality has enough assets as is. Do we really want more "goodies" for people to fight over? If we add more stuff like this, than no one will ever do infantry.

That being said, I think that these models are beautiful and we put together well. My hats off to the USI guys.

Dirt