Page 1 of 1
Russian tanks.
Posted: 2006-04-16 08:02
by Pence
We all know that the MEC are going to use Russian weaponry (unless the devs make a tank that does not exsist and the MEC manufactured it) but more-so with the selection of tanks. I think there should be attention to witch tank should be made, if the dev's are able.
I personaly think that the T-90 is fine but would like to see some T-55's, T-64's and T-72's.
Posted: 2006-04-16 08:44
by six7
i would rather be in a jeep than a t72 in this game.
Posted: 2006-04-16 08:58
by Campez
Yeah me 2....
Posted: 2006-04-16 09:34
by Zepheris Casull
looking at the inventory of the possible candidates of the MEC though, it's hard to imagine them without the T-72s.
Posted: 2006-04-16 09:45
by Pence
Its funny but the T-55 is apealing to me because of the problem with no turret floor.
Posted: 2006-04-16 16:05
by [T]Terranova7
Does it just have to be Russian tanks? I know China, Ukraine, Poland and such nations have a few tank models that they may be willing to export.
Posted: 2006-04-16 16:37
by UK-Sniper[ENG]
* T-72 (700)
* T-62 (500)
* T-55/54 (500)
* Type-69 (350)
* Type-59 (150)
wiki pedia says iraqi army has/had these. might check a few other countries
Posted: 2006-04-16 17:32
by IDF-Godzilla
Im for some T-72's with ERA.
Another thing is, Iran is developing some kind of tank, called Zolfaqar, maybe it can be used also
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... lfiqar.htm
Another thing, if PR ever decide to make Insurgent army i think the best option is T-55 tanks.
Posted: 2006-04-16 17:33
by Pence
But the loader can be crushed by the breach in the T-55, its the most user-unfriendly vehicals ever!
Posted: 2006-04-16 18:09
by UK-Sniper[ENG]
if they made an insurgent army i think they should just make the insurgents have an advantage by the map layout and give them good anti-tank and IED stuff. Then combating the tanks would be a little easier.
Posted: 2006-04-16 18:15
by Pence
'UK-Sniper[ENG wrote:']if they made an insurgent army i think they should just make the insurgents have an advantage by the map layout and give them good anti-tank and IED stuff. Then combating the tanks would be a little easier.
What is BF2 without tanks?
Posted: 2006-04-16 18:37
by six7
Pence wrote:What is BF2 without tanks?
i really poor infantry combat game

Posted: 2006-04-16 18:47
by Pence
six7 wrote:i really poor infantry combat game
True, its a game FOR vehicals.
Posted: 2006-04-16 18:50
by six7
i like playing infantry having to fight against/alongside/around vehicles. opens it up for more true to life infantry combat

Posted: 2006-04-16 21:10
by UK-Sniper[ENG]
I mean no tanks on insurgent team. other team has, tsssh. A few nice civvy cars for insurgents.
Posted: 2006-04-16 21:48
by Grey_Ghost
Zepheris Casull wrote:looking at the inventory of the possible candidates of the MEC though, it's hard to imagine them without the T-72s.
Not if we are under the assumption that we're fighting their Elite Forces.
Posted: 2006-04-17 01:43
by dunkellic
I WANT ERA EVERYWHERE - ERA AND INFANTRY!!!!111

Posted: 2006-04-17 02:05
by Zepheris Casull
Grey_Ghost: fair enough, but we can't be fighting their elite force everytime now can we? No matter how elite their elite force is i would think eventually we will fight their regular forces, and thus it will not be out of place at all to see T-72s in action.
dunkellic: ERA as in ERA panel??? they don't mix well with infantry u know... not even the soft explosion ERA, i for one would never want to be anywhere near such tank.
Posted: 2006-04-17 11:05
by dunkellic
Zepheris Casull wrote:
dunkellic: ERA as in ERA panel??? they don't mix well with infantry u know... not even the soft explosion ERA, i for one would never want to be anywhere near such tank.
yeah, it should have been a joke, you know
