Project Reality Forums

Hey guyz, i known its not a MAJOR change or anything like, but i think it would be cool to actulay add the supply crate in the truck back, rather than be empty whit supply crate fallin from nowhere, if atleast you put the static inside of it ( i mean to the model itself ) the Log and then use the empty logistrick as the transport one, people will stop shooting everywhere if they dosent seen outside.

In fact, its all about DETAIL.

Add a crate to the log truck, that would be alot better than a truck that realy look empty.

I agree with you...but there must be SOME reason that the DEVs didn't already do it. Maybe it's a lagg creator or maybe it even causes a crash.

If we can get a DEV to say otherwise, then it should be added for sure (more realism is always good).

Dude388 wrote:I agree with you...but there must be SOME reason that the DEVs didn't already do it. Maybe it's a lagg creator or maybe it even causes a crash.

If we can get a DEV to say otherwise, then it should be added for sure (more realism is always good).

Yup, But it would be awesome if all veichles could have that kind of thing. Like a HMW having an ammo box in the back.

Dude388 wrote:I agree with you...but there must be SOME reason that the DEVs didn't already do it. Maybe it's a lagg creator or maybe it even causes a crash.

If we can get a DEV to say otherwise, then it should be added for sure (more realism is always good).

Details is not priority in PR, that's considered gay ??:.

nicoliani wrote:Details is not priority in PR, that's considered gay ??:.

Yeah and a truck that look empty droping 2 crate from "magic pocket" is way better and more realistic.

Just had the static on the model, it wont make it lag, if the crate is actuly added to the model of the truck itself.

but whene u drop them wont it still stay in the tuck itsself ?

if your doing work on the support truck, could we get a rounder stearing wheel, silly but just annoying

Having the box stay in the truck itself would be the easiest way to model it. If I recall we've had problems trying to model things that disappear out of the models once being deployed.