Page 1 of 1
bf1943 Engine +PR???? - no.
Posted: 2009-04-06 23:43
by crevan805
I heard BF1943 is comin out on computer, anyway to take that and completly change it to what PR is now, except ya got a better engine n everything? lol
Kinda a loaded question, very broad. I think if ya took the Frostbite engine, and put PR on it, that would be the most epicness thing ever, talk to EA, i don't know what you guys could do..Probly have thought of this alrdy tho >.< lol.
Re: bf1943 Engine +PR????
Posted: 2009-04-06 23:50
by Harrod200
PR ain't gonna change engines. Especially not for the BF43 one with a 24 player limit.
Re: bf1943 Engine +PR????
Posted: 2009-04-06 23:51
by AgentMongoose
crevan805 wrote:I heard BF1943 is comin out on computer, anyway to take that and completly change it to what PR is now, except ya got a better engine n everything? lol
Kinda a loaded question, very broad. I think if ya took the Frostbite engine, and put PR on it, that would be the most epicness thing ever, talk to EA, i don't know what you guys could do..Probly have thought of this alrdy tho >.< lol.
the servers are limited to 32 players iirc. 32players = not PR worthy engine
Re: bf1943 Engine +PR????
Posted: 2009-04-07 00:07
by Harrod200
AgentMongoose wrote:the servers are limited to 32 players iirc. 32players = not PR worthy engine
You got 8 too many. Apparently, EA think that 64 people are too many on one server, and 24 means everyone is better off with not having to think near as much. Also, same map size + less people = MOAR TANKSZ for the noobs to waste.
Re: bf1943 Engine +PR????
Posted: 2009-04-07 01:15
by Ace42
Harrod200 wrote:You got 8 too many. Apparently, EA think that 64 people are too many on one server
It's kinda understandable; unlike early on in its life, 64-man vBF2 servers are a minority. The remaining servers nearly all use the larger 64-man map size, resulting in a disappointingly empty conflict and a struggle to find full servers. Limiting the max server size gives then a greater degree of control over what players are faced with, and thus the raw gameplay experience.
Not that I am saying I think this is the way to go, EA are notoriously short-sighted in the positioning of games in the market, but it is understandable.
And yes, it makes it unsuitable for PR2.
Re: bf1943 Engine +PR????
Posted: 2009-04-07 01:17
by charliegrs
i wish there was something like an automatic lock on threads that involve changing the PR engine. its been done to death.
Re: bf1943 Engine +PR???? - no.
Posted: 2009-04-07 01:33
by $pyker
NO! NO! NO!
Re: bf1943 Engine +PR???? - no.
Posted: 2009-04-07 02:09
by Katarn
Project Reality will not be modifying Battlefield 1943 in any way, shape, or form.
Re: bf1943 Engine +PR???? - no.
Posted: 2009-04-07 02:14
by 503
BF1943 is the worst piece of **** DICE has ever released. Considering it's player limit, I wouldn't even play PR on that engine.
Re: bf1943 Engine +PR???? - no.
Posted: 2009-04-07 02:20
by Igloo35
what about a 24 hour ban on the next person who brings up changing engines?
mod thoughts?
Re: bf1943 Engine +PR???? - no.
Posted: 2009-04-07 02:35
by gclark03
Permaban for anyone who taints these blessed forums with the blasphemous utterance of the words 'BF1943'.
Re: bf1943 Engine +PR???? - no.
Posted: 2009-04-07 02:44
by Tirak
Please direct all discussion of PR on new engines here:
https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f18-pr ... tions.html