Page 1 of 1
Pretty sure this hasen't been suggested yet.
Posted: 2009-05-05 22:46
by RandomUserABC
Side seats on tanks =) i mean, instead of having the regular Driver/Gunner/.50 combination, you could have some people sitting on the back of the tank.
Dunno if that would pose problems for turning the tank turret 180 degrees, just something to take into consideration
EDIT: Right, stupid suggestion =\ sorry.
Close down the thread please?
Re: Pretty sure this hasen't been suggested yet.
Posted: 2009-05-05 22:52
by ReapersWarrior
this is going to get shot down quicker then i can probably reply...
1. APC's, or ARMORED PERSONNEL CARRIERS are in the game for that purpose.
2. men would not sit on tanks during combat
3. Pointless
4. It has been suggested before.
need i go on?

Re: Pretty sure this hasen't been suggested yet.
Posted: 2009-05-05 22:54
by Redamare
Yeaaaaaa........ ..... .... lololol about that

you should probly take off the post is not going to happen :L sorry
Re: Pretty sure this hasen't been suggested yet.
Posted: 2009-05-05 23:04
by R.J.Travis
No I love his idea it would be just like the tank in Halo ! no really I like this idea!
Tank with a Lat and a Hat on it ! added it now! good idea.
Re: Pretty sure this hasen't been suggested yet.
Posted: 2009-05-05 23:06
by dominator200
ReapersWarrior wrote:this is going to get shot down quicker then i can probably reply...
1. APC's, or ARMORED PERSONNEL CARRIERS are in the game for that purpose.
2. men would not sit on tanks during combat
3. Pointless
4. It has been suggested before.
need i go on?
this is untrue casualties in the second gulf were caused by us troops sitting on battle tanks as they went through a town obivously this wasnt true all the way through as they got wise to it but in the first couple of days this was a cause of casualties
Re: Pretty sure this hasen't been suggested yet.
Posted: 2009-05-05 23:07
by Airsoft
There's a reason they stopped doing this

Re: Pretty sure this hasen't been suggested yet.
Posted: 2009-05-05 23:13
by daranz
Personally, I think it'd only be a good idea for militia. Conventional armies would never do it, but militia already rides into combat on the backs of technicals, so sitting on a tank would fit.
Of course, you'd still have the issues with a bunch of RPGs riding on the back of a tank...
Re: Pretty sure this hasen't been suggested yet.
Posted: 2009-05-05 23:19
by R.J.Travis
daranz wrote:Personally, I think it'd only be a good idea for militia. Conventional armies would never do it, but militia already rides into combat on the backs of technicals, so sitting on a tank would fit.
Of course, you'd still have the issues with a bunch of RPGs riding on the back of a tank...
A little off topic but as a Insurgent I got in the Merlin and the pilot drove me around the map was cool.
Re: Pretty sure this hasen't been suggested yet.
Posted: 2009-05-05 23:23
by McBumLuv
daranz wrote:Personally, I think it'd only be a good idea for militia. Conventional armies would never do it, but militia already rides into combat on the backs of technicals, so sitting on a tank would fit.
Of course, you'd still have the issues with a bunch of RPGs riding on the back of a tank...
Yea, wouldn't mind the "militia" (well, chechens really) being able to do this. It's not like it'll outway the use of an APC, since it still would have neither speed nor armour compared to the APCs. HOWEVER, I highly doubt it would be useful in the situation that the team DOES have an APC, and in the case that there are no APCs around, it would be quite unrealistic to see tanks simply ferrying troops around.
For those reasons, I don't see it as something that's needed.
Re: Pretty sure this hasen't been suggested yet.
Posted: 2009-05-06 01:06
by crazy11
DTsoy wrote:EDIT: Right, stupid suggestion =\ sorry.
Close down the thread please?
Closed at OP's request.