[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:Also in your last pic I'm pretty sure that is not HMS Invincible since the ski jump extends to the very end of the ship as well as many other big differences.
It's not HMS Invincible, it says in the caption that it's an Invincible class carrier/CVS.
The carrier is actually the Spanish flagship Principe de Asturias**. Not even part of the RN let alone an Invincible class carrier
Either way... back to the OP:
Adding any RFA Bay class (or any part of the RFA flotilla) is a waste of time and not needed, even if there are any large "amhpibious assualt" maps added for the British, like all parts of the RFA, Bay class are used to supply RN warships with fuel, food and ammunition whilst they are at sea so they can remain operational..
Apart from
perhaps in the Falklands although the RFA are trained to operate in close to military operations, they do not land on beaches and unload troops "in the thick of it". I'm guessing one good reason for this could be that the RFA are civilians.
"The Bay Class are designed to operate over the horizon using helicopters and landing craft through a floodable stern dock to get men and equipment ashore."
Source
Kind of thought you'd know this being in the Merchant?
Should be great to see HMS Ocean though which contrary to Rudd saying it's a carrier is actually an LPD (as I notice Rhino has already mentioned).
With what it can carry IRL, it should be very versatile and suit a quite few different types of amphibious assault maps - or course someone would also need to add some LCVP Mk 5's
