Dr2B Rudd wrote:how is the medic ill equipped to provide fire support?
He has a gun doesnt he?!!!
Its is my personal belief the some palyers have been trained in to telling their medics to hide somewhere because that means they are less likely to be punished for stupid acts of their own, if there's som1 to clean the booboo and get you back up, it means that in your mind, that rambo charge is less risky than it really is.
Agree'd.
Now, I find that the helmets and vest changes (MEC medic to me feels the MOST affected by this) from their comrades makes them more visible.
And yes, the British Officer's beret does make him more of a target. I feel that it is a bit silly to have but it has less of an effect than that of the medic's. Yeah, so you shot the Officer. Who's going to bring him back to life and put another rifle pointing at you? The medic. Because the medic plays such a large role in the squad, it seems almost silly that he should stick out from a crowd.
Obviously, if you see a soldier prone into a body and pulling CPR or reviving, it's not hard to tell he's a medic. We don't need it to be MORE obvious than that.
Cheditor wrote:A few things, one you were in the middle of this hatted group i persume, well thats where i would fire, explosion would hopefully wound and/or kill everyone. Two the medic i think should be able to be spotted out of the other groups as it then makes you defend the medic, it makes the medic get down and not rush out or put his head up too much.
I believe was 2nd in line. Out of a dispersed line. Maybe it was indeed a coincidence, but I didn't feel that way after about 15+ deaths on Kufrah where I was the first one killed, whether I walked first or last, or anywhere in between.
Also, just FYI, HAT no longer has a large kill radius, so I was the only one killed in my squad by that HAT (pretty much making it a total waste)
jigsaw-uk wrote:This is where you are going wrong. As a medic you should not be engaging the enemy unless absolutely necessary, your job is to keep your head down, stay alive and help your mates when they get hit.
By trying to provide fire support when you are ill equipped to do so you are doing nothing but risking your own life and the lives of your squad mates.
I feel that this is not where I am 'going', but rather where the gameplay has taken us, that is 'wrong'.
A medic/corpsman is, from what I understand, absolutely no less than a Rifleman. He has a rifle, and that is his first job. When a man is down, it is his and his squad's job to secure the area, revive the casualty, and prepare him for medivac when possible. He is just the man who happens to be doing the reviving directly, and holds the equipment to do so. All US army recruits, for instance, are taught Basic Lifesaving skills, such as how to apply a field dressing on the wounded. Which, you know, everyone in PR has a field dressing. And they know how to use them. The medic's bag is basically a bunch of field dressings, some flesh-mending tools (sutures, stitches, whatever they carry) and maybe pain-shots, which allow him to perform some of the more serious work. Just because a Rifleman carries the ammo bag doesn't mean he's the only one that knows how to work a gun, you know?
Just because he has an ironsight rifle does not mean he is 'ill-equipped' to provide firesupport. A gun is still a gun, and I often have all of my squad's rifles pointing to a target, regardless of who they are in the squad. I would rather have one ironsight rifleman firing at a target as best they can to add some extra suppression and allow my scoped men to fire accurately than have one man unable to fire at the enemy, anyday.
Especially when it's not I who have started the firefight. For instance, an ambush could cause a very sticky situation when there's not too much cover around. And when your medic goes and makes a run for it, he may only be greeted by a grenadier round, SAW suppression, or otherwise, instead of being able to be part of the cohesive fighting unit that is your squad.
And
EVEN IF you prefer your medic to be hiding behind a rock 30m behind the frontline, you can have it your way! What's it going to hurt to allow others to have the option I have presented during a firefight? It just adds another strategy to utilizing your medic to your preference and ability.
(If that last paragraph comes off sarcastically, it is not intended. I'm not sure how to rephrase it better than this at the moment.)
jbgeezer wrote:Aim for the red cross! No really, I just fire at the biggest treath, but if I see a somebody that looks like theire trying to revive somebody (when I am a sniper) I kill him before the others, I have always done that. With the new system I usually only have to worry about one of the lifesaveres, thank God.
However, for instance when someone is sniper, it currently takes only a short glance to see who is the medic in a group.
If a medic and rifleman both the same uniform, helment, and otherwise, it would take a bit of examining to tell which one was the medic (IE: Look for at his kit on his body for the red cross or the medic bag, or watch him for a bit to see if he pulls out his medic supplies/epipens/begins to perform CPR, or take a shot at one of them and see how they all react to pick out the medic from the rest of the group... you may even get lucky and nail the medic right off causing the others to scramble for the kit).